Abstract

In Experiment I, two-syllable words were presented in a multi-channel tachisto-scope. The whole word (W), first syllable (S1), and second syllable (S2) were displayed independently according to various schedules of successive 50-ms exposures; the exposures were in immediate succession, with no break apparent to the subject. Accuracy of identifying the words was facilitated by presenting a syllable before or after the whole word (S1W, S2W or WS1, WS2) in comparison with presenting the whole word alone (W). Presentation of the whole word for 100 ms (WW) produced better performance than sequential presentation of the first syllable, the whole word, and the second syllable for 50 ms each (S1WS2); the whole-word presentation (WW) was also superior to the reverse sequence (S2WS1). In Experiment II, strings of random digits were presented in the formats of S1WS2, WW, and S2WS1. Unlike the results of Experiment I, performance in the sequential conditions was not different from that in the simultaneous condition. It was concluded that sequential tachistoscopic presentation does not affect identification of unrelated characters, although it does disrupt the process of word recognition. Three hypotheses to explain the disruption were discussed: distortion of phonological representation, interruption of medial letter clusters, and fragmentation of the whole word.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.