Abstract
BackgroundTablet and capsule forms have advantages and disadvantages in the market. Generally, the tablet form (500 mg) of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is more convenient for drug ingestion and more cost-effective than the capsule form (250 mg). We examined the efficacy and safety of MMF in its different forms combined with tacrolimus in liver transplant recipients.MethodsA randomized controlled trial was performed to compare the efficacy and safety between the tablet form of MMF (tablet group) and the capsule form of MMF (capsule group) in liver transplant patients. One hundred sixteen patients were enrolled in the present study from 2014 to 2017. Fifty-six patients in the full-analysis set (FAS) population were in the capsule group and 60 were in the tablet group. The primary endpoint was incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) by 24 weeks after liver transplantation (LT). Secondary endpoints were patient survival, serum creatinine level, and adverse events (AEs).ResultsIn the per-protocol population, 45 patients were in the tablet group and 49 were in the capsule group. There were no statistically significant differences in MMF dose, mycophenolic acid trough level, and tacrolimus trough level between the two groups. The incidence of BPAR at 24 weeks after randomization was 6.7% in the tablet group and 6.1% in the capsule group (P=0.627). All patients with BPAR responded well to steroid pulse therapy and increased tacrolimus. Serum creatine level and eGFR were not different between the two groups. The incidence of serious AEs was 7.2% in the tablet group and 7.6% in the capsule group, and none were related to formulation. There was no significant difference in incidence of discontinuations or serious AEs between the two groups.ConclusionThe present study suggests that the new tablet formulation can be a useful treatment option to maintain a consistent systemic exposure level of MMF, which may help reduce graft failure in liver transplant patients.
Highlights
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is the most common immunosuppressant used to relieve calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-related complications because of its low toxicity
We examined the renal function with serum creatinine level and with eGFR by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula.[7]
Generic mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (My-Rept), a 250-mg capsule produced by Chong Kun Dang Pharmaceutical Corporation, was first introduced and approved by the KFDA in 2008
Summary
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is the most common immunosuppressant used to relieve calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-related complications because of its low toxicity. MMF has a CNI-sparing effect with the ability to reduce acute rejection or graft failure.[1,2] MMF is associated with leukopenia and gastrointestinal (GI) complications such as vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain. These often require reduction of MMF dose.[1,3]. Conclusion: The present study suggests that the new tablet formulation can be a useful treatment option to maintain a consistent systemic exposure level of MMF, which may help reduce graft failure in liver transplant patients.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
