Abstract
Hermeneutic Single-Case EfficacyDesign (HSCED) is a systematic case study research method involving the cross-examination of mixed method data to generate both plausible arguments that the client changed due to therapy and alternative explanations. The present study is the fourth article of a case series which has investigated the process and outcome of transactional analysis psychotherapy using Hermeneutic Single-Case Efficacy Design (Elliott 2002). The client, Linda, was a 45 yearold white British woman with mild depression who attended nine sessions of therapy. The conclusion of the judges was that this was a mixed-outcome case:whilst the client improved over the course of therapy and was positive about her experience of therapy, her changes did not last when she experienced considerable stressful events during follow-up. Linda provided a detailed and idiosyncratic description of the aspects of the therapy which were most helpful for her. A cross-case comparison with other cases in this series suggests several interesting features which are worthy of further investigation. Specifically, the use of a shared theoretical framework and an egalitarian therapeutic relationship were helpful. As with other cases in this series, the client experienced positive changes in her interpersonal relationships suggesting that this outcome of TA therapy warrants further investigation
Highlights
Editor’s Note: For the 1st paper in this series, which appeared in IJTAR 3:1, the author provided detailed appendices: the case record, affirmative and sceptic cases, judges’ opinions, and various templates including adherence checklists. This is the fourth and final Hermeneutic Single-Case Efficacy Design (Elliott, 2002) study in the current case series conducted by the author as part of his doctoral research investigating the process and outcome of TA psychotherapy for depression
This case presents an ambiguous picture of change where an initial examination of the results suggests no clear and immediately obvious conclusion regarding outcome. This is perhaps the sort of situation where Hermeneutic Single-Case Efficacy Design (HSCED) shows particular strength as an investigation method by developing arguments which account for this mixed picture of change and seeking external verdicts regarding the outcome of the case
HSCED (Elliott, et al, 2009) is a systematic case study research method which examines individual cases and can be used to: (a) evaluate whether change has occurred; (b) examine evidence causally linking client change to the therapy; (c) evaluate alternative explanations for client change; and (d) identify the specific processes that appear to have been responsible for change
Summary
This is the fourth and final Hermeneutic Single-Case Efficacy Design (Elliott, 2002) study in the current case series conducted by the author as part of his doctoral research investigating the process and outcome of TA psychotherapy for depression. This case presents an ambiguous picture of change where an initial examination of the results suggests no clear and immediately obvious conclusion regarding outcome. The evidence that is used in a HSCED study is based on a rich case record of the client and their therapy and uses both quantitative and qualitative data
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Transactional Analysis Research & Practice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.