Abstract

BackgroundSource monitoring (SM) is a metacognitive process involved in making judgments about the origin of memories, knowledge and beliefs. Many studies have demonstrated that people with schizophrenia perform more poorly on tasks of source monitoring when compared to non-schizophrenic. Although source of monitoring is considered as an important cognitive biases implicated in reality distortions/psychotic symptoms, the knowledge on its neurocognitive mechanisms is far from being conclusive. The main aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between SM and neuropsychological functioning in schizophrenia.MethodsA total of 84 (43 females; mean age 42.01, SD=11.55) patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were assessed with neuropsychological tests, including executive functions, verbal memory, working memory, processing speed and attention. SM was assessed with an action memory task. Simple actions were presented to the participant verbally (text) or non-verbally (icons). Some actions were physically performed and others were imagined. Following the learning phase, participants were presented with each action as well as new ones, were asked whether the action was presented verbally or non-verbally (action’s presentation type discrimination), and whether the action was performed or imagined (self-monitoring). A knowledge corruption for self-monitoring (proportion of high confident errors on all high confident responses) was also obtained. The symptoms severity was assessed with the PANSS. The relationship between SM biases and neuropsychological functioning was investigated with correlation analyses.ResultsThe correlations were found between incorrect action’s presentation type discrimination and the results of test such as CTT 1 (r=-0.22, p<0.05), D2 (r=-0.25, p<0.05) and Block Design (r= -0.40, p<0.01). Correlational analyses showed no relations between incorrect self-monitoring and neuropsychological functioning. Knowledge corruption for self-monitoring turned out to be correlated with WCST (r=0,22, p<0.05), CVLT (r= -0.26, p<0.05) and Backward Digit Span (r= -0.27, p<0.05). These correlations remain significant when controlled for positive symptoms severity. Incorrect self-monitoring showed a significant relation with the PANSS positive subscale (r=0.23, p<0.05). Knowledge corruption was related to PANSS disorganization subscale (r=0.25, p<0.05).DiscussionIn line with previous studies we found that deficits in self-monitoring are related to symptoms severity and not to neuropsychological functioning. On the other hand, deficits in action’s presentation discrimination are related exclusively to neuropsychological functioning. These results suggest that the relationship between SM and neuropsychological functioning depends on the type of SM deficits. The conclusions of the study may be of clinical importance - in light of our results it might be advisable to combine cognitive remediation techniques with those interventions that focus on cognitive biases like source monitoring deficits

Highlights

  • Cognitive deficits are prevalent among patients with schizophrenia and are robustly associated with functioning and outcome

  • In the remaining 8 tests: Digit symbol-coding (DSC), Picture Completion (PC), Matrix Reasoning (MR), V, Test A (TTA), Test B (TTB), Phonological Fluency (PF) and Semantic Fluency (SF), there were no significant differences in performance between baseline and follow-up assessments

  • Patients will be assessed with the same instruments adopted in the first study: a questionnaire for clinical and demographic information; SAPS, SANS, Calgary Depression Scale and a battery of neurocognitive tests comprising: Digit Span Forward (DSF), Digit Span Backward (DSB), Rey Complex Figure Copy (RCFC), Rey Complex Figure Memory

Read more

Summary

Background

The positive symptoms of psychosis are recognized as being on a continuum with phenomena that are experienced by many members of the general population (i.e., non-clinical samples). Participants completed a test of ability to discriminate real from fake news along with several individual difference measures These included measures of delusion-like ideation (the Peters et al Delusion Inventory [PDI]), engagement in analytic thinking (the Cognitive Reflection Test [CRT]), and the degree to which one values evidence in forming and revising beliefs (the Actively Open-Minded Thinking Questionnaire [AOT]). Discussion: Consistent with the notion that belief in fake news represents a point on the same continuum as belief in delusional and delusion-like ideas, belief in fake news was associated with increased endorsement of delusionlike ideation This relationship was partially explained by factors previously associated with delusions and delusion-like ideation (e.g., lower engagement in analytic thinking, lower valuation of evidence in belief formation and revision). Marco Garzitto*,1, Lana Kambeitz-Ilankovic, Carolina Bonivento, Sara Piccin, Stefan Borgwardt, Eva Meisenzahl, Marlene Rosen, Raimo Salokangas, Rachel Upthegrove, Stephen Wood, Nikolaos Koutsouleris, Paolo Brambilla

Findings
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.