Abstract

BackgroundAberrant motor function is an integral part of Schizophrenia. In fact, abnormalities are frequently found in patients, in populations at risk, and in unaffected relatives. Motor abnormalities are suspected to be relevant for the clinical outcome and could probably predict the conversion from at-risk individuals to schizophrenia. Furthermore, motor function and has been argued as endophenotype of the disorder. Yet, which particular motor domain may classify as a potential endophenotype is unknown. We aimed to compare schizophrenia patients, unaffected first degree relatives and healthy controls for different motor domains. We expected impairments in all domains in patients and in some domains in relatives.MethodsWe included 43 schizophrenia patients, 34 unaffected first degree relatives of schizophrenia patients and 29 healthy control subjects, matched for age, gender and education level. We compared motor function of five domains between the groups. The domains comprise neurological soft sings (NSS), abnormal involuntary movements (dyskinesia), Parkinsonism, complex fine motor function applying the coin rotation task as well as finger tapping. Furthermore, we tested the association of motor function of the five domains with working memory, frontal lobe function and nonverbal intelligence for each group separately using within-group bivariate correlations.ResultsSchizophrenia patients showed poorer motor function in all tested domains compared to healthy controls. First-degree relatives had intermediate ratings with aberrant function in two motor domains. In detail, relatives had significantly more NSS and performed poorer in the finger tapping task than controls. In contrast, in relatives complex fine motor function was intact. Relatives did not differ from controls in dyskinesia or Parkinsonism severity.DiscussionTaken together, schizophrenia patients have motor abnormalities in all tested domains. Thus, motor abnormalities are a key element of the disorder. Likewise, first degree relatives presented motor deficits in two domains. A clear difference between relatives and healthy controls was found for NSS and finger tapping. Thus, NSS and finger tapping may be a potential marker of vulnerability for schizophrenia. The lack of association between genetic risk and dyskinesia or Parkinsonism suggests distinct pathobiological mechanisms in the various motor abnormalities in schizophrenia.

Highlights

  • Gestational disruptions are linked to the risk of schizophrenia; but in most cases, there is a lack of a clear history or observable anomaly indicating that the disruptions are likely to be subtle (Murray et al, 2017)

  • The depth of the superior frontal sulcus was the only predictor of the variation in the cognitive score (F[1,54]=8.7, p=0.005)

  • Aberrant motor function is an integral part of Schizophrenia

Read more

Summary

Poster Session I

787 biologists, shared the same mean decade of birth, the 1780s, and essentially the same geographic origin in Western Europe. The mathematicians showed a very significant SCZ liability-like, GP1-coincident seasonality while the biologists showed an even more significant SCZ resistance-like, GP2-coincident seasonality. The latter effect was strong among naturalists, anatomists and other groups representing biological “observationalism” as opposed to “experimentalism.” Discussion: The findings are discussed in light of a) new evidence that the annual photoperiod is alone responsible for both peaks of general births, with the GP1 and the GP2 being caused by maternal periconceptional exposure to, respectively, the summer-solstice sunlight maximum and the winter-solstice minimum, and b) an approach/withdrawal theory of lateralization of basic emotions where the left cerebral cortex would handle external stimuli eliciting complacent emotions towards external realities while the right cortex would handle internal stimuli eliciting disdain for those realities. DEVIANT CORTICAL SULCATION RELATED TO SCHIZOPHRENIA, BUT NOT COGNITIVE DEFICITS, LIKELY PREDATE BRAIN DEVELOPMENT IN THE SECOND TRIMESTER

Background
Findings

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.