Abstract

G A A b st ra ct s others [55.4 (30.6-71.7) ng/mL in GU-M and 24.1 (16.7-59.2) ng/mL in GU-U, respectively]. Consequently, the more proximal the ulcer located in the stomach, the lower the PGI/PGII ratio was; 4.15 (3.51-5.00) in DU, 5.09 (4.13-6.40) in GU-P, 3.46 (2.70-4.12) in GU-A, 3.12 (2.70-3.45) in GU-L, 2.70 (2.37-3.79) in GU-M, and 1.80 (1.38-2.43) in GU-U. 7/65 (10.8%), 3/65 (4.6%) and 0/65 (0.0%) in DU, 1/9 (11.1%), 0/9 (0.0%) and 0/9(0.0%) in GU-P, 12/48(25.0%), 6/48(12.5%) and 0/48(0.0%) in GU-A, 3/12 (25.0%), 1/12 (8.3%) and 0/12 (0.0%) in GU-L, 11/21 (52.4%), 9/21 (42.9%) and 0/21 (0.0%) in GU-M, and 14/17 (82.4%), 12/17 (70.6%) and 9/17 (52.9%) in GU-U, were compatible with each of the three respective criteria in screening tests of subjects at high-risk for gastric cancer; PGI ≦ 70 ng/mL and PGI/PGII ratio ≦ 3.0, PGI ≦ 50 ng/mL and PGI/PGII ratio ≦ 3.0, and PGI ≦ 30 ng/mL and PGI/PGII ratio ≦ 2.0. CONCLUSIONS: PGI and the PGI/PGII ratio correlated well with the location of an ulcer. It is thought that patients with an ulcer in the middle body or more proximal differ from those with more distally located one, when considering gastric acid secretory function and gastric cancer risk.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.