Abstract

Rationale Our main focus in the laboratory is to understanding the mechanisms of how oral immunotherapy (OIT) improves outcomes in patients. In this study, we aimed to determine if OIT is specific only to the food allergens administered in OIT or also to other offending allergens (i.e. “bystander effect”). To accomplish our aim, we studied T cell reactivity (i.e. proliferation assays) and T cell specificity (i.e. tetramer assays with peanut peptides) in both effector T cell (CD4+CD25neg) or Teff and regulatory T cell (CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+) or Treg subsets.

Highlights

  • Rationale Our main focus in the laboratory is to understanding the mechanisms of how oral immunotherapy (OIT) improves outcomes in patients

  • We aimed to determine if OIT is specific only to the food allergens administered in OIT or to other offending allergens (i.e. “bystander effect”)

  • We studied T cell reactivity and T cell specificity in both effector T cell (CD4+CD25neg) or Teff and regulatory T cell (CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+) or Treg subsets

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rationale Our main focus in the laboratory is to understanding the mechanisms of how oral immunotherapy (OIT) improves outcomes in patients. We aimed to determine if OIT is specific only to the food allergens administered in OIT or to other offending allergens We studied T cell reactivity (i.e. proliferation assays) and T cell specificity (i.e. tetramer assays with peanut peptides) in both effector T cell (CD4+CD25neg) or Teff and regulatory T cell (CD4+CD25hiFoxp3+) or Treg subsets

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call