T Cell Responses Directed Against HLA A*0201-Restricted Epitopes Derived from WT1 Are Readily Identifiable in Patients with AML and CML, but Not in Patients with ALL.

Abstract

The WT1 gene contributes to leukemogenesis and all adult ALL, AML and CML express WT1 RNA by quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) techniques. WT1 may therefore be a useful antigenic target for immunotherapy. Four HLA-A*0201-restricted WT1 T cell epitopes have been identified: Db126 (RMFPNAPYL), WH187 (SLGEQQYSV), WT37-45 (VLDFAPPGA) and WT235 (CMTWNQMNL), but only Db126 has been extensively studied in myeloid leukemias. Here, we sought CD8+ T cells directed against these epitopes in 12 healthy SCT donors, 6 patients with AML, 8 with, CML and 6 with ALL prior to SCT. All patients tested with myeloid or lymphoid leukemias expressed MHC class I, B7.1 and WT1. To detect very low frequencies of WT1-specific CD8+ T cells, we used qPCR for interferon-g (IFN-g) mRNA. After isolation, 106 CD8+ T cells were stimulated with C1R-A2 cells (MHC class I-defective LCL cells transfected with HLA-A*0201) loaded with test peptides at concentrations of 0.1, 1 and 10 mM to determine their functional avidity. CD8+ T cells were also stimulated with CMV pp65 (positive control) and gp100 (209-2M) (negative control) peptides. After 3 hr coculture, cells were harvested for RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis. qPCR was performed for IFN-g mRNA and normalized to copies of CD8 mRNA from the same sample. Parallel assays using tetramers demonstrated that the IFN-g copy number was linearly related to the frequency of tetramer-binding T cells, sensitive to frequencies of 1 responding CD8+ T cell/100 000 CD8+ T cells. A positive response was defined as a threshold of 100 or more IFN-g mRNA copies/104 CD8 copies and a stimulation index (SI) of 2 or more, where SI = IFN-g mRNA copies/104 CD8 copies in peptide pulsed/unpulsed cultures. Responses to at least one WT1 peptide were detected in 5/8 CML patients, 4/6 patients with AML and 7/12 healthy donors. Notably, a response was not elicited to WT1 in any of the 6 patients with ALL, despite evidence of immune competence as shown by a normal CMV response. Five of five CML responders and 3/4 AML responders recognized 2 or more WT1 epitopes, while the 7 healthy donors recognized only one WT1 epitope. The range of IFN-g mRNA copies/104 CD8 copies was 289–13584, 418–45891 and 160–2683 for CML, AML and healthy donors respectively. WT1-specific tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells displayed both central memory (CD45RO+CD27+CD57−) and terminally differentiated effector memory phenotypes (CD45RO-CD27−CD57+). As multiple WT1-derived epitopes can be targeted simultaneously, it is likely that T cell response to WT1 is polyclonal. These results are important because the presence of memory WT1 responses in patients with myeloid leukemias and healthy individuals should favor vaccination as a means to expand immune responses to leukemia in the autologous and allogeneic transplant setting. Furthermore, the presence of CD8+ T cell responses to multiple WT1 epitopes should favor robust polyclonal immune responses to leukemia. However, failure to detect CD8+ T cell responses to WT1 in ALL patients suggests that WT1 may not be a useful antigen to target for immunotherapeutic purposes in this patient group.