Abstract
Previous meta-analyses using traditional pairwise comparisons did not support intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control in patients with diabetes and included trials published before 2015. We aimed to identify the optimal SBP control targets in patients with type 2 diabetes using a systematic review and network meta-analysis of accumulating evidence. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to August 29, 2022 for randomized controlled trials comparing different blood pressure targets, antihypertensive agents against placebo, or dual antihypertensive agents against single agent in patients with type 2 diabetes. Network meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled results of direct and indirect comparisons of each 5 mm Hg SBP category in association with clinical outcomes adjusted for baseline risk and intervention duration (PROSPERO [International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews], CRD 42022316697). We identified 30 trials including 59 934 patients with type 2 diabetes. The mean achieved SBP levels ranged from 117 mm Hg to 144 mm Hg among treatment groups. A total of 7799 major cardiovascular diseases events and 4130 deaths were reported. The lowest risk of major cardiovascular diseases was found in patients with achieved SBP level of 120 to 124 mm Hg. The hazard ratio and 95% CI were 0.73 (0.52-1.02) compared with 130 to 134 mm Hg, 0.60 (0.41-0.85) compared with 140 to 144 mm Hg, and 0.41 (0.26-0.63) compared with ≥150 mm Hg. Similar results were found for cardiovascular diseases components including stroke, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cardiovascular mortality. All-cause mortality was reduced at an achieved SBP <140 mm Hg but further reduction did not show additional benefits. Our findings support an intensive blood pressure-lowering strategy to prevent major cardiovascular diseases in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.