Abstract

Adverse outcomes that result from chemical toxicity are rarely caused by dysregulation of individual proteins; rather, they are often caused by system-level perturbations in networks of molecular events. To fully understand the mechanisms of toxicity, it is necessary to recognize the interactions of molecules, pathways, and biological processes within these networks. The developing brain is a prime example of an extremely complex network, which makes developmental neurotoxicity one of the most challenging areas in toxicology. We have developed a systems toxicology method that uses a computable biological network to represent molecular interactions in the developing brain of zebrafish larvae. The network is curated from scientific literature and describes interactions between biological processes, signaling pathways, and adverse outcomes associated with neurotoxicity. This allows us to identify important signaling hubs, pathway interactions, and emergent adverse outcomes, providing a more complete understanding of neurotoxicity. Here, we describe the construction of a zebrafish developmental neurotoxicity network and its validation by integration with publicly available neurotoxicity-related transcriptomic datasets. Our network analysis identified consistent regulation of tumor suppressors p53 and retinoblastoma 1 (Rb1) as well as the oncogene Krüppel-like factor (Klf8) in response to chemically induced developmental neurotoxicity. The developed network can be used to interpret transcriptomic data in a neurotoxicological context.

Highlights

  • The developing brain is vulnerable to drugs and environmental chemicals (Rice and Barone, 2000)

  • Biological Expression Language (BEL) uses controlled vocabularies for node names; for example, human genes and proteins are labeled in accordance with the HUGO Gene Nomenclature Committee (HGNC) vocabulary, and biological processes follow the Gene Ontology Biological Process (GOBP) vocabulary

  • Our results suggest that zebrafish larvae respond to domoic acid (Domo) to rats and that the eventual reduction in the number of dopaminergic neurons is preceded by aberrant dopamine release

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The developing brain is vulnerable to drugs and environmental chemicals (Rice and Barone, 2000). Developmental Neurotoxicity Assessment in Zebrafish developmental neurotoxicity (DNT) of chemicals, provided by the Organisation for Economic Co−operation and Development (OECD) (OECD, 2007) and the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) (EPA, 1996), recommend in vivo rodent experiments. The number of chemicals tested for DNT is low (Makris et al, 2009) and represents only a small fraction of the thousands of chemicals in commercial use (Crofton et al, 2012). In vitro cell culture methods are fast, relatively inexpensive, and very useful in studying the mechanisms of DNT (Bal-Price et al, 2010). Their use obligates one to simplify the central nervous system (CNS) to a single or few cell types in culture. The zebrafish (Danio rerio) larva is an alternative model that can be used to complement the in vitro and rodent approaches in studying DNT

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call