Abstract

The staff of a state public health leadership institute used a national leadership competency set as guidance for its curriculum. An important competency of that and several other national competency sets is systems thinking. Efforts to provide useful training in systems thinking were only partially successful. Literature searches revealed only one successful application in practice, even though surveys find that systems thinking continues to be a critical training need. During its final year, the staff of the institute developed a framework for a personal system thinking approach, which was favorably received by institute participants. The great majority of the participants in the institute were middle managers who were expected to develop their leadership skills and advance in their careers. This paper presents a refined version of the systems thinking framework. Among the advantages, it provides are: it requires no expenditure other than time, it requires no consultants, it can be tailored to the needs of any worker, it can be revisited as often as desirable, it recognizes that conflict and competition are ever-present in organizations and agencies, and it a can provide a roadmap for personal leadership action.

Highlights

  • The idea of a system, if not the term itself, has been a way of thinking about human relationships at least since Greek philosophers studied the polis (Aristotle, 1962: pp. 289-295)

  • It provides are: it requires no expenditure other than time, it requires no consultants, it can be tailored to the needs of any worker, it can be revisited as often as desirable, it recognizes that conflict and competition are ever-present in organizations and agencies, and it a can provide a roadmap for personal leadership action

  • Systems Thinking in a State Level Leadership Institute Curriculum. In view of this continued and strong need for systems thinking training, the experience of a state level public health leadership institute may be helpful for other public health organizations that wish to strengthen their members’ systems

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The idea of a system, if not the term itself, has been a way of thinking about human relationships at least since Greek philosophers studied the polis (Aristotle, 1962: pp. 289-295). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention soon established grants to create public health leadership institutes at the national, regional, and state levels primarily in schools of public health. These created a formal network of such institutes. The major conceptual work of the leadership institute network was the creation of a competency set that contained a prominent place for systems thinking (Wright et al, 2000) This competency framework became the basis for the institutes’ training programs reaching thousands of public health practitioners and academics. Given the workforce turnover in public health agencies, there will be an ongoing need for training, and it is likely that the resources available for such training will be increasingly scarce

Systems Thinking in a State Level Leadership Institute Curriculum
Strategies Adopted to Integrate Systems Thinking into Curriculum
Federal Egg Diagram
Boundary Definition Issues
Did Major Practice Journals Publish Applications of Systems Thinking?
Limitations on Institute Participants
Definitional Issues
Creation of a Personal Framework for Systems Thinking
Critical Aspects of the Framework
Importance of Personal Relationships
Conflict and Competition Always Present
Questions Related to the Managers Themselves
Relations with Supervisor Do you know your supervisor’s personal goals?
The Time Dimension What is the history of your unit?
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call