Abstract

AbstractStandard graphical representations have played a crucial role in science and engineering throughout the last century. Without electrical symbolism, it is very likely that our industrial society would not have evolved at the same pace. Similarly, specialized notations such as the Feynmann notation or the process flow diagrams did a lot for the adoption of concepts in their own fields. With the advent of Systems Biology, and more recently of Synthetic Biology, the need for precise and unambiguous descriptions of biochemical interactions has become more pressing. While some ideas have been advanced over the last decade, with a few detailed proposals, no actual community standard has emerged. The Systems Biology Graphical Notation (SBGN) is a graphical representation crafted over several years by a community of biochemists, modellers and computer scientists. Three orthogonal and complementary languages have been created, the Process Descriptions, the Entity Relationships and the Activity Flows. Using these three idioms a scientist can represent any network of biochemical interactions, which can then be interpreted in an unambiguous way. The set of symbols used is limited, and the grammar quite simple, to allow its usage ranging from textbooks and teaching in high schools to peer reviewed articles in scientific journals. The first level of the SBGN Activity Flow language has been publicly released. Shared by the communities of biochemists, genomic scientists, theoreticians and computational biologists, SBGN languages will foster efficient storage, exchange and reuse of information on signaling pathways, metabolic networks and gene regulatory maps.

Highlights

  • The goal of the Systems Biology Graphical Notation (SBGN) is to standardize the graphical/visual representation of essential biochemical and cellular processes

  • A level of one of the SBGN languages represents a set of features deemed to fit together cohesively, constituting a usable set of functionality that the user community agrees is sufficient for a reasonable set of tasks and goals

  • The development of SBGN languages is envisioned to proceed in stages, with each higher levels adding richness compared to the levels below it

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The previous chapters describe the appearance and meaning of SBGN Activity Flow Level 1 components. The components of an Activity Flow map have to be placed in a meaningful way – a random distribution with spaghetti-like connections will most likely hide the information encoded in the underlying model, whereas an elegant placement of the objects, giving a congenial appearance of the maps, may reveal new insights. We provide a list of additional suggestions which may help in producing aesthetically more pleasant layouts, possibly easier to understand. Those layout guidelines are independent of the method used to produce the map, and apply to both manually drawn maps as well as maps produced by an automatic layout algorithm. The meaning of a graph should be conserved upon scaling as far as possible

SBGN levels and versions
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION
Note on typographical convention
Overview
Controlled vocabularies used in SBGN Activity Flow Level 1
Activity node material types
Activity node conceptual types
Physical characteristics of compartments
Activity nodes
Glyph: Biological activity
Auxiliary units
Container nodes
Glyph: Submap
Modulation arcs
Logical operators
Concepts
Syntax
Containment definition
Semantic rules
Compartments
Modulation
Submaps
Rules for mapping to submaps
Node-node overlaps
Node-edge crossing
Avoid edge crossings
Comprehensive list of achnowledgements
Financial Support
CHAPTER 5. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call