Abstract

BackgroundErosive lichen planus affecting the vulva (ELPV) is a relatively rare, chronic condition causing painful raw areas in the vulvovaginal region. Symptoms are pain and burning, which impact upon daily living. There is paucity of evidence regarding therapy. A 2012 Cochrane systematic review found no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in this field. Topically administered corticosteroids are the accepted first-line therapy: however, there is uncertainty as to which second-line treatments to use. Several systemic agents have been clinically noted to show promise for ELPV refractory to topically administered corticosteroids but there is no RCT evidence to support these. The ‘hELP’ study is a RCT with an internal pilot phase designed to provide high-quality evidence.Methods/DesignThe objective is to test whether systemic therapy in addition to standard topical therapy is a beneficial second-line treatment for ELPV. Adjunctive systemic therapies used are hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil and prednisolone. Topical therapy plus a short course of prednisolone given orally is considered the comparator intervention. The trial is a four-armed, open-label, pragmatic RCT which uses a blinded independent clinical assessor. To provide 80 % power for each comparison, 96 participants are required in total. The pilot phase aims to recruit 40 participants.The primary clinical outcome is the proportion of patients achieving treatment success at 6 months. ‘Success’ is defined by a composite measure of Patient Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 on a 4-point scale plus improvement from baseline on clinical photographs scored by a clinician blinded to treatment allocation. Secondary clinical outcomes include 6-month assessment of: (1) Reduction in pain/soreness; (2) Global assessment of disease; (3) Response at other affected mucosal sites; (4) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores; (5) Sexual function; (6) Health-related quality of life using ‘Short Form 36’ and ‘Skindex-29’ questionnaires; (7) Days of topical steroid use; (8) Treatment satisfaction; (9) Discontinuation of medications due to treatment failure; (10) Per participant cost of intervention in each treatment group. Adverse events will also be reported.Discussion‘hELP’ is the first RCT to address second-line treatment of ELPV. The trial has encountered unique methodological challenges and has required collaborative efforts of the UK Dermatology Clinical Trials Network alongside expert clinicians.Trial registration: current controlled trialsISRCTN 81883379. Date of registration 12 June 2014.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-015-1133-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Erosive lichen planus affecting the vulva (ELPV) is a relatively rare, chronic condition causing painful raw areas in the vulvovaginal region

  • Topical therapy alone would have been a simpler comparator, but we considered it unethical to continue this alone as, by definition to enter the trial, topical therapy must have failed

  • The use of live vaccines is not permitted during the intervention phase of the trial and the prescription of any additional medications for ELPV during the trial period is considered as a treatment failure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Erosive lichen planus affecting the vulva (ELPV) is a relatively rare, chronic condition causing painful raw areas in the vulvovaginal region. Administered corticosteroids are the accepted first-line therapy: there is uncertainty as to which second-line treatments to use. Several systemic agents have been clinically noted to show promise for ELPV refractory to topically administered corticosteroids but there is no RCT evidence to support these. Erosive lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory, scarring skin condition that most commonly occurs on the mucosal surfaces of the mouth and genital region. Erosive lichen planus affecting the vulvovaginal region (ELPV) causes painful raw areas at the vaginal entrance, and subsequent scarring leads to anatomical changes with narrowing of the vaginal canal. ELPV is estimated to affect 0.01 % of women. This is likely an underestimate with many cases failing to present to medical services [7]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.