Abstract
ABSTRACT In this article, we study the forecasting power of 12 different systemic risk measures on the macroeconomic shocks in China. We employ the FQGLS estimation with structural break. The violation of classical assumptions is detected, and the significant difference between OLS and FQGLS estimations further highlights the importance of model specification. The combined forecasts significantly outperform the historical mean in out-of-sample predictions, although most of the individual forecasts cannot. That is, the macroeconomic shock is predictable by the systemic risk measures, but the noise overwhelms the signal coming from real systemic risk.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
