Abstract

This paper analyses the effects of regional renewable electricity self-sufficiency targets on the power system in Germany. For this purpose, an interdisciplinary approach from social sciences and energy system modelling was chosen, which allows considering qualitative factors such as public acceptance or political stability. Following the concept of context scenarios, consistent raw scenarios are generated by a cross-impact balance analysis (CIB), and the scenarios are quantified by the unit commitment and expansion cost minimisation model ENTIGRIS considering power plants, storages, and the electricity grid. This approach enables an understanding of the system framework conditions and their relationships and allows the combination of qualitative and quantitative scenario descriptors. The most important factors for setting regional self-sufficiency targets were identified through interviews. The main system effects identified are: The regional distribution of generation capacities is strongly influenced by a more demand-oriented installation of generation capacities. This leads to less grid reinforcement, but higher rates of curtailment. In all scenarios, higher utilization of the PV roof potential instead of ground mounted could be observed. The total system costs are increasing only slightly with regional self-supply targets. In general, it was found that the influence of regional self-sufficiency targets is less pronounced in scenarios that already achieve high national RES shares than in scenarios that achieve lower shares, since technology, storage and grid expansion measures are necessary anyway to achieve high RES shares. Overall, the effects here are rather small and the regional objective is not associated with major disadvantages for the system. In a future characterised by stagnation, the system can benefit from regional targeting, as higher renewable shares and lower costs can result. The main conclusion therefore is that regional target setting seem to be beneficial for the overall power system, in terms of system cost, national RE share, acceptance and CO2-emissions.

Highlights

  • Almost 190 countries have signed the Paris Agreement, which aims to keep the global temperature rise well below 2 ◦ C and limit it to 1.5 ◦ C [1]

  • To gain a deeper understanding of the effects of regional self-supply targets on the national electricity system, this paper develops different plausible scenarios, combining qualitative factors such as the acceptance and quantitative factors like prices for renewable energy technologies and quantifies the effects on the national system by using a numeric optimisation model (ENTIGRIS) for the power system for the example of Germany

  • A methodology is applied that enables the quantification of effects related to the setting of regional self-supply targets using plausible scenarios, designed by cross-impact balance analysis (CIB) analysis, and the power system model ENTIGRIS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Almost 190 countries have signed the Paris Agreement, which aims to keep the global temperature rise well below 2 ◦ C and limit it to 1.5 ◦ C [1]. In addition to the national targets, targets are set at the local level (regional self-supply targets), e.g., by municipalities or cities that want to achieve 100% RE supply. To gain a deeper understanding of the effects of regional self-supply targets on the national electricity system, this paper develops different plausible scenarios, combining qualitative factors such as the acceptance and quantitative factors like prices for renewable energy technologies and quantifies the effects on the national system by using a numeric optimisation model (ENTIGRIS) for the power system for the example of Germany. For each scenario variants with and without regional self-sufficiency, targets were calculated to enable a quantification of the effect on the national power system concerning generation technologies, storage and grid expansion and operation (e.g., CO2- emissions and curtailment), as well as their regional distribution and the total system cost

Literature Review
Energy Autarky and Autonomy
Scenarios and Energy System Modeling
Decentralization or Autarky in Energy Modeling
Methodology
Power System Model ENTIGIS
Self-Supply Potential and Regional Clustering for Targets
Self-Supply
Potential regional self-supply for assumed
The Temporal Resolution of the Model
Consistent Scenarios
Qualitative System Analysis
Storylines
Electricity Market Model Results and Discussion
System Design and Operation
System Costs
A In Bthe “Adaption”
Regional
Regional Distribution of Technologies
Model Limitations
Conclusions
Findings
10.40 GBP per kW uranium power plant

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.