Systematic Review: Safety and Efficacy Comparison of Laser Therapy With And Other Resurfacing Technology

Abstract

There is an increasing demand of almost all young and adult population for the noninvasive cosmetic procedures specially to enhance the facial appearance and the requirement has expanded all over the world. This review was designed to identify and summarize the literature/evidence from different types of research/clinical studies conducted in facial resurfacing methodologies. A systematic review was designed and conducted in relation to facial resurfacing and rejuvenating techniques using data from PubMed, MEDLINE Cochrane database and Scopus. Systematic review protocol guidelines were used for research questions, aim of the review and PICO breakdown, eligibility criteria and used search engine and extraction of data. A minimum of 17 clinical studies and reviews were identified including randomized clinical trials. Significant results have been obtained in some clinical trials about techniques of rejuvenation and some studies have elucidated contrasting evidence. In most of the work, ablative and non-ablative laser therapy had been compared and we found that some results were compatible, and others showed contrasting evidence. In conclusion, more high-quality randomized control clinical trials are needed to decide on better safety and effectiveness of ablative or non-ablative laser therapy vs conventional treatments.