Systematic Review of the Global Literature on Uncomplicated Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Women: Underscoring Major Heterogeneity

Abstract

ObjectivesTo examine the global literature database on uncomplicated recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI), this systematic review assesses the availability of rUTI data based on geographic region and elucidates the current state of research and gaps in knowledge. MethodsThe databases PubMed, Embase, WHO Global Index Medicus, and SciELO were searched for keywords related to rUTI between 2000 and 2023. Three independent reviewers screened studies restricted to female participants age ≥18 years with uncomplicated rUTIs. Studies were excluded if they did not provide a definition for rUTI or did not cite or report an estimate for rUTI prevalence. The review was registered in PROSPERO and conformed to PRISMA guidelines. ResultsThe search yielded 2,947 studies of which 124 were ultimately included. Convenience samples were used for 91% of studies and sample sizes were 30% n<50, 29% n=50-99, 22% n=100-199, 36% n≥200. Most studies were conducted in Europe (41%) or North America (39%), were prospective (52%), at tertiary centers (49%) and included all ages ≥18 (60%). The most common definition for rUTI was 2 UTI/6m or 3 UTI/1y (62%). Regardless of study location, most studies cited prevalence estimates for rUTI derived from U.S.-based populations. ConclusionsThis study represents the first formal investigation of the global literature base on uncomplicated rUTI. Studies on rUTIs are globally of small scale and definitions used for rUTI are heterogeneous. More studies are needed to ascertain the true prevalence of rUTI outside of North America and Europe.