Abstract
ABSTRACTBackgroundHigh‐quality prevalence studies are important in estimating the burden of disease in a population, thus informing priority setting, resource allocation, delivery, and use of health services.ObjectivesThis study was undertaken to systematically review the methods and results of previous prevalence studies of progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and corticobasal syndrome (CBS) and make recommendations for future studies.MethodsA total of 2 authors independently identified original articles that described the prevalence of PSP or CBS using several comprehensive and overlapping search strategies, assessed study quality, and extracted relevant data. Descriptive and pooled analyses were performed as appropriate.ResultsA total of 16 studies were identified in PSP and 9 studies in CBS, with highly heterogeneous methods of case definition, identification, and verification in identified studies. Few studies were deemed of necessary quality or methodological homogeneity to justify a full meta‐analysis. In addition, few studies reported age‐ and sex‐stratified results. The best 3 prevalence studies in PSP gave a pooled rate of 7.1 per 100,000 per year, whereas the pooled rate in 2 CBS studies was roughly 3 times lower at 2.3 per 100,000 per year. Based on crude rates, there was little evidence to suggest clear sex differences in the prevalence of PSP or CBS or that the prevalence of PSP had increased over time, but some evidence to suggest that prevalence may increase with increasing age.ConclusionGiven the paucity of prevalence studies in PSP and CBS, further high‐quality prevalence studies are necessary.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.