Abstract

BackgroundArrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) is an inherited disorder of cardiac desmosomes associated with ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The clinical diagnosis is problematic and relies on a complex criteria composed of clinical and non-clinical parameters. In 2010, the original 1994 Task Force Criteria (TFC) was revised with particular attention given to the imaging parameters. MethodsFive retrospective studies compared the diagnostic concordance between the 1994 and 2010 TFC. Three studies used cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) and compared major and minor CMR criteria and three studies compared definite ARVC cases; one study assessed both. ResultsThree studies with 1435 patients compared the 1994 imaging and the 2010 CMR criteria. Using the 1994 criteria, 123 (8.6%) and 419 (29.2%) patients satisfied major and minor criteria compared to only 52 (3.6%) and 28 (1.9%) using the 2010 criteria; 57.7% and 94.3% reduction in major and minor criteria (p value, 0.0001 and 0.0001). Three studies with 611 patients assessed for definite ARVC. Using the 1994 and 2010 criteria, 207 (33.9%) and 243 (39.8%) patients satisfied the parameters respectively. This resulted in a statistically significant 17.4% (p value, 0.0379) increase in ARVC cases driven largely by two sub-groups. ConclusionsThe 2010 revised TFC have resulted in a significant reduction in the number of patients that satisfy CMR criteria particularly those that satisfied minor imaging abnormalities using the 1994 criteria. In addition, in certain groups the revised criteria have significantly increased the number of patients diagnosed with definite ARVC.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.