Abstract

BackgroundVarious interventions have been undertaken in Iran to promote evidence-informed health policy-making (EIHP). Identifying the challenges in EIHP is the first step toward strengthening EIHP in each country through the design of tailored interventions. Therefore, the current study was conducted to synthesize the results of earlier studies and to finalize the list of barriers to EIHP in Iran.MethodsTo identify the barriers to EIHP in Iran, two steps were taken: a systematic review and policy dialogue. To conduct the systematic review, three Iranian databases and PubMed, Health Systems Evidence (HSE), Embase, and Scopus were searched. The reference lists of included papers and documentation from some local organizations were hand-searched. Upon conducting the systematic review, given the significance of stakeholders in clarifying the problem of EIHP, policy dialogue was used to complete the list previously extracted and to do advocacy. Selection criteria for the stakeholders included influential and informed individuals from knowledge-producing, knowledge-utilizing, and knowledge-brokering organizations. Semi-structured interviews were held with three important absent stakeholders.ResultsChallenges specific to Iran that were identified included the lack of integration of the health ministry and the medical universities, lack of ties between health knowledge utilization organizations, failure to establish long-term research plans, neglect of national research needs at the time of recruiting human resources in knowledge-producing organizations, and duplication and lack of coordination in routine data obtained from surveillance systems, disease registration systems, and censuses. It seems that some challenges are common across countries, including neglecting the importance of inter- and intra-disciplinary studies, the capacity of policy-makers and managers to utilize evidence, the criteria for evaluating the performance of policy-makers, managers, and academic members, the absence of long-term programmes in knowledge-utilizing organizations, the rapid replacement of policy-makers and managers, and lack of use of evaluation studies.ConclusionsIn this study, we tried to identify the challenges regarding EIHP in Iran using a systematic review and policy dialogue approach. This is the first step toward determining the best interventions to improve evidence-informed policy-making in each country, because these challenges are contextual and need to be investigated contextually.

Highlights

  • Various interventions have been undertaken in Iran to promote evidence-informed health policy-making (EIHP)

  • The most important steps taken are the establishment of the Supreme Council of Health and Food Security (SCHFS) by the government as the main reference for health and food security policy-making and decision-making, in which evidence utilization has been defined throughout its policy-making cycle; establishment of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), aimed at producing evidence for the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME); creation of the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme [4]; and the development of standards and tariffs in the MOHME and the creation of the Health Policy-making Council within the MOHME

  • This study showed that the greatest impact of HTA results involved decisions related to budget allocation for medical equipment [6]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Various interventions have been undertaken in Iran to promote evidence-informed health policy-making (EIHP). In Iran, various structural and procedural interventions have been undertaken to promote evidenceinformed health policy-making (EIHP) [3]. The most important steps taken are the establishment of the Supreme Council of Health and Food Security (SCHFS) by the government as the main reference for health and food security policy-making and decision-making, in which evidence utilization has been defined throughout its policy-making cycle; establishment of the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), aimed at producing evidence for the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MOHME); creation of the Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme [4]; and the development of standards and tariffs in the MOHME and the creation of the Health Policy-making Council within the MOHME. This study showed that the greatest impact of HTA results involved decisions related to budget allocation for medical equipment [6]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.