Abstract

Background: Crohn disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease that affects quality of life. There are several drugs available for the treatment of CD, but their relative efficacy is unknown due to a lack of high-quality head-to-head randomized controlled trials. Aim: To perform a mixed comparison of the efficacy and safety of biosimilars, biologics and JAK1 inhibitors for CD. Methods: We searched PubMed, Web of Science, embase and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to Dec. 28, 2020. Only RCTs that compared the efficacy or safety of biosimilars, biologics and JAK1 inhibitors with placebo or another active agent for CD were included in the comparative analysis. Efficacy outcomes were the induction of remission, maintenance of remission and steroid-free remission, and safety outcomes were serious adverse events (AEs) and infections. The Bayesian method was utilized to compare the treatments. The registration number is CRD42020187807. Results: Twenty-eight studies and 29 RCTs were identified in our systematic review. The network meta-analysis demonstrated that infliximab and adalimumab were superior to certolizumab pegol (OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.35–4.97; OR 2.96, 95% CI 1.57–5.40, respectively) and tofacitinib (OR 2.55, 95% CI 1.27–5.97; OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.47–6.52, respectively) and revealed the superiority of CT-P13 compared with placebo (OR 2.90, 95% CI 1.31–7.59) for the induction of remission. Infliximab (OR 7.49, 95% CI 1.85–34.77), adalimumab (OR 10.76, 95% CI 2.61–52.35), certolizumab pegol (OR 4.41, 95% CI 1.10–21.08), vedolizumab (OR 4.99, 95% CI 1.19–25.54) and CT-P13 (OR 10.93, 95% CI 2.10–64.37) were superior to filgotinib for the maintenance of remission. Moreover, infliximab (OR 3.80, 95% CI 1.49–10.23), adalimumab (OR 4.86, 95% CI 1.43–16.95), vedolizumab (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.21–6.52) and CT-P13 (OR 5.15, 95% CI 1.05–27.58) were superior to placebo for steroid-free remission. Among all treatments, adalimumab ranked highest for the induction of remission, and CT-P13 ranked highest for the maintenance of remission and steroid-free remission. Conclusion: CT-P13 was more efficacious than numerous biological agents and JAK1 inhibitors and should be recommended for the treatment of CD. Further head-to-head RCTs are warranted to compare these drugs.

Highlights

  • Crohn disease (CD) is a common chronic inflammatory disease with an increasing prevalence and financial burden in recent decades (Ng et al, 2013; Aniwan et al, 2017)

  • Some JAK1 inhibitors, as oral low-molecular-weight products that affect intracellular molecules involved in signaling of various cytokines, growth factors, and hormones (Schwartz et al, 2016), have been confirmed to be effective for clinical or endoscopic remission; these therapies are associated with an increased risk of infections (Olivera et al, 2017; Ma et al, 2019)

  • The authors concluded that ustekinumab and vedolizumab were effective for the induction of clinical remission in biologic-naïve patients, the two were inferior to infliximab and adalimumab

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Crohn disease (CD) is a common chronic inflammatory disease with an increasing prevalence and financial burden in recent decades (Ng et al, 2013; Aniwan et al, 2017). Some JAK1 inhibitors (tofacitinib, filgotinib, upadacitinib), as oral low-molecular-weight products that affect intracellular molecules involved in signaling of various cytokines, growth factors, and hormones (Schwartz et al, 2016), have been confirmed to be effective for clinical or endoscopic remission; these therapies are associated with an increased risk of infections (Olivera et al, 2017; Ma et al, 2019). The results were inconsistent due to methodological limitations, and studies with more reliable statistical methods are needed to verify the outcomes. With reference to these published articles, we found few studies assessing the effectiveness of biosimilars, biologic agents and small molecule inhibitors. There are several drugs available for the treatment of CD, but their relative efficacy is unknown due to a lack of high-quality head-to-head randomized controlled trials

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.