Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of perioperative outcomes and prognosis of transurethral en-bloc resection vs. conventional transurethral resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Abstract

ObjectivesThis article aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of perioperative outcomes and prognosis of transurethral en-bloc resection versus conventional transurethral resection for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL) to find eligible RCTs. The studies were classified by version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials. Review Manager 5.4.0 was used to evaluate the data. The certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Guideline Development Tool by GRADEpro GDT. ResultsSeven RCTs with 1142 patients was included in the present study. The results indicated that bladder perforation (OR = 0.17; 95% CI 0.05 to 0.67; P = 0.01), obturator nerve reflex (OR = 0.03; 95% CI 0.01 to 0.13; P < 0.00001), residual tumor (OR = 0.24; 95% CI 0.08 to 0.77; P = 0.02) and repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor (re-TURBT) (OR = 0.54; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.85; P = 0.008) were significantly reduced in the en-bloc resection group than the conventional resection group. However, there were no significant differences in hemoglobin deficit (p = 0.31), urethral stricture (p = 0.47), and detrusor muscle presence (P = 0.16) between both groups. Besides, resection time (p = 0.25), operative time (p = 0.20), catheter dwell time (p = 0.24), and length of hospital stay (p = 0.16) were similar in the two groups. Meanwhile, en-bloc resection yielded no advantage for the 3-month (P = 0.11), 6-month (P = 0.05), 1-year (P = 0.61), 2-year (P = 0.53), and 3-year (P = 0.26) tumor recurrence rates. ConclusionsOur meta-analysis shows that transurethral en-bloc resection is associated with comparable outcomes to conventional transurethral resection for recurrence-free survival in NMIBC patients. En-bloc resection is more feasible and safer than conventional resection for NMIBC, with fewer intraoperative complications, less residual tumor, and less re-TURBT.