Abstract

Production of human mesenchymal stem cells for allogeneic cell therapies requires scalable, cost‐effective manufacturing processes. Microcarriers enable the culture of anchorage‐dependent cells in stirred‐tank bioreactors. However, no robust, transferable methodology for microcarrier selection exists, with studies providing little or no reason explaining why a microcarrier was employed. We systematically evaluated 13 microcarriers for human bone marrow‐derived MSC (hBM‐MSCs) expansion from three donors to establish a reproducible and transferable methodology for microcarrier selection. Monolayer studies demonstrated input cell line variability with respect to growth kinetics and metabolite flux. HBM‐MSC1 underwent more cumulative population doublings over three passages in comparison to hBM‐MSC2 and hBM‐MSC3. In 100 mL spinner flasks, agitated conditions were significantly better than static conditions, irrespective of donor, and relative microcarrier performance was identical where the same microcarriers outperformed others with respect to growth kinetics and metabolite flux. Relative growth kinetics between donor cells on the microcarriers were the same as the monolayer study. Plastic microcarriers were selected as the optimal microcarrier for hBM‐MSC expansion. HBM‐MSCs were successfully harvested and characterised, demonstrating hBM‐MSC immunophenotype and differentiation capacity. This approach provides a systematic method for microcarrier selection, and the findings identify potentially significant bioprocessing implications for microcarrier‐based allogeneic cell therapy manufacture.

Highlights

  • Pioneering work in the 1970s led to the isolation and identification of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) [1, 2]; these cells are considered to be a promising candidate for cell-based therapies, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications due to their multipotency, propensity to grow in vitro, promising efficacy data, ease of isolation and immune modulatory properties [3,4,5,6,7]

  • This study systematically evaluates microcarriers for human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (hBM-MSC) from three different donors, provides a set of key criteria which define the ‘ideal’ microcarrier and provides a reproducible and transferable methodology for selecting an appropriate microcarrier for hBM-MSC culture

  • Significant differences were observed with respect to the viable cell number between hBM-MSC1 and hBM-MSC2 (p < 0.01) and hBM-MSC1 and hBM-MSC3 (p < 0.005) for passages 1 and 2, and the difference is exacerbated by passage 3 (Fig. 1A)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Pioneering work in the 1970s led to the isolation and identification of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) [1, 2]; these cells are considered to be a promising candidate for cell-based therapies, tissue engineering and regenerative medicine applications due to their multipotency, propensity to grow in vitro, promising efficacy data, ease of isolation and immune modulatory properties [3,4,5,6,7]. The effective transfer of human MSCs (hMSCs) into widespread clinical application will depend, to a large extent, on the development of large-.

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call