Systematic meta-analysis on percutaneous ethanol injection and percutaneous acid injection for the treatment of early HCC: A Cochrane analysis

Abstract

e15657 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common global cancer with high geographical variability. When HCC is detected early, percutaneous approaches such as percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI), and radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFTA) have curative potential and represent low invasive alternatives to surgery. The role of percutaneous ethanol or acetic acid injection and other percutaneous interventions except RFTA has not been addressed in a systematic metaanalysis. The objective was to evaluate the effects of PEI and PAI for early HCC. Methods: A systematic search was performed in EMBASE, Cochrane Central, The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Medline and Scopus as well as a handsearch of meeting abstracts. Only randomised controlled trials were included. RFTA studies were not considered. Primary endpoint was overall survival, secondary endpoints were cancer free survival, number and type of adverse events, duration of hospital stay, and quality of life. Results: 3 studies covering 261 patients were identified. Two studies compared PEI with PAI. 91 and 94 patients with one to three HCC-nodules ≤ 3cm underwent PEI and PAI, respectively. Overall survival (HR 1.47; 95% CI 0.68 to 3.19) and cancer free survival (HR 1.42; 95% CI 0.68 to 2.94) were not significantly different after treatment by PEI versus PAI. Both treatments were safe with no serious adverse events reported and modest pain being the most frequent adverse event. Data on the duration of hospital stay were inconclusive and data on quality of life not available. One study compared PEI with surgery. 38 patients were allocated to each treatment arm. There was no significant difference in survival (HR 1.57; 95% CI 0.53 to 4.61) and cancer free survival (HR 1.35; 95% CI 0.69 to 2.63). No serious adverse events were reported in the PEI group but 3 postoperative deaths occurred in the surgery arm. Conclusions: PEI and PAI are similarly effective and safe in patients with one to three small (≤ 3 cm) HCC nodules. Although the evidence is weaker, the beneficial effect of PEI is comparable to that of segmental liver resection and thus should be used preferentially due to its low morbidity and mortality. No significant financial relationships to disclose.