Abstract

BackgroundCell functions depend on molecules organized in the cellular society. Two basic components are mRNA molecules and proteins. The interactions within and between those two components are crucial for carrying out sophisticated cell functions. The interplay can be analyzed by comparing expression levels of mRNA and proteins. This is critical for understanding the molecular interactions, (post-) transcriptional regulations and conservation of co-expression between mRNAs and proteins. By using high-throughput transcriptome and proteome data, this study aims to systematically investigate the general picture of such expression correlations. We analyze four groups of correlations: (i) transcript levels of different genes, (ii) protein levels of different genes, (iii) mRNA levels with protein levels of different genes and (iv) mRNA levels with protein levels of same genes. This helps to obtain global insights into the stability and variability of co-expression and correlation of mRNA and protein levels.ResultsAnalysis of the simultaneous co-expression of mRNAs and proteins yields mainly weak correlations. Therefore we introduce the concept of time-delayed co-expression patterns. Based on a time-course dataset, we obtain a high fraction of time-delayed correlations. In group (i), 67% of different transcripts are significantly correlated. At the protein level (ii), 68% of different proteins are significantly correlated. Comparison of the different molecular levels results in a 74% fraction of correlated transcript and protein levels of different genes (iii) and 56% for the same genes (iv). Furthermore, a higher fraction of protein levels (simultaneously 20% and short time-delayed 29%) is correlated than at the transcript level (10% and 18% respectively). Analysis of the dynamics of the correlation shows that correlation at the transcript level is largely passed to the protein level. In contrast, specific co-expression patterns are changed in multiple ways.ConclusionsOur analysis reveals that the regulation of transcription and translation contains a time-delayed component. The correlation at the protein level is more synchronous or delayed by shorter time than those at the transcript level. This supports the hypothesis that a higher degree of direct physical interactions require a higher synchronicity between the interacting partners. The conservation of correlation between the transcript level (i) and the protein level (ii) sheds light on the processes underlying transcription, translation and regulation. A future investigation of the conditions of conservation will give comprehensive insights in the complexity of the regulatory mechanisms.

Highlights

  • Cell functions depend on molecules organized in the cellular society

  • The abundance of mRNA transcripts is calculated by applying the MOID algorithm for high-density oligonucleotide array analysis

  • The MOID algorithm provides a p-value for each measurement and a metric to evaluate the confidence of each data point

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cell functions depend on molecules organized in the cellular society. Two basic components are mRNA molecules and proteins. MRNA co-expression has been systematically investigated in several eukaryotic species to detect hierarchical patterns represented as trees These patterns recur in different pathways and exhibit linear, nonlinear, local, global, time-delayed, monotonic and non-monotonic characteristics. For the analysis at the protein level, two-dimensional gel electrophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry (2DE-MS) has been widely used to generate protein expression profiles [10,11] Based on such data, many researchers have analyzed the correlation between mRNA and protein expression of the same gene [12,13,14,15,16]. Correlation between mRNA levels will not necessarily be conserved in the corresponding protein levels because of differences in post-transcriptional modifications and regulations The impact of these mechanisms on the propagation of co-expression from mRNA to protein levels has not yet been systematically investigated. The dynamics introduce a time delay since the corresponding molecular processes are not instantaneous

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call