Abstract

Previous research has shown that precision and power grip performance is consistently influenced by simultaneous articulation. For example, power grip responses are performed relatively fast with the open-back vowel [a], whereas precision grip responses are performed relatively fast with the close-front vowel [i]. In the present study, the participants were presented with a picture of a hand shaped to the precision or power grip. They were required to pronounce speech sounds according to the front/above perspective of the hand. The results showed that not only the grip performance is affected by simultaneously pronouncing the speech sound but also the production of speech sound can be affected by viewing an image of a grip. The precision grip stimulus triggered relatively rapid production of the front-close vowel [i]. In contrast, the effect related to the power grip stimulus was mostly linked to the vertical dimension of the pronounced vowel since this stimulus triggered relatively rapid production of the back-open vowel [a] and back-mid-open vowel [o] while production of the back-close vowel [u] was not influenced by it. The fact that production of the dorsal consonant [k] or coronal consonant [t] were not influenced by these stimuli suggests that the effect was not associated with a relative front-back tongue shape of the articulation in the absence of changes in any vertical articulatory components. These findings provide evidence for an intimate interaction between certain articulatory gestures and grip types, suggesting that an overlapping visuomotor network operates for planning articulatory gestures and grasp actions.

Highlights

  • The present study uses behavioural techniques to investigate interaction between processes that plan articulatory gestures and hand movements

  • Given that we have previously proposed that front-close articulations are connected to precision grasp processes whereas back-open articulations are connected to power grasp processes [29], we anticipated that viewing the precision grip might decrease formant 1 (F1) values and increase formant 2 (F2) values, while the power grip might increase F1 values and decrease F2 values

  • The present study shows that are manual grasp responses influenced by observed grasp actions [40] but similar stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) effects can be observed in relation to vocal responses

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The present study uses behavioural techniques to investigate interaction between processes that plan articulatory gestures and hand movements. Given that body parts are somatotopically represented in the primary motor cortex [1], at the first glance, this research topic might appear to be rather surprising. It is known that the motor representations of one body part can be involved in planning and executing actions with another body part. This has been shown to be the case in relation to hand and mouth actions [2,3]. Magnetoencephalography (MEG) evidence have shown increased activation in the hand.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.