Abstract

Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is a common inherited cause of premature cardiovascular disease, but the majority of patients remain undiagnosed. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of interventions to systematically identify FH in primary care. No randomised, controlled studies were identified; however, three non-randomised intervention studies were eligible for inclusion. All three studies systematically identified FH using reminders (on-screen prompts) in electronic health records. There was insufficient evidence that providing comments on laboratory test results increased the identification of FH using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network (DLCN) criteria. Similarly, using prompts combined with postal invitation demonstrated no significant increase in definite FH identification using Simon-Broome (SB) criteria; however, the identification of possible FH increased by 25.4% (CI 17.75 to 33.97%). Using on-screen prompts alone demonstrated a small increase of 0.05% (95% CI 0.03 to 0.07%) in identifying definite FH using SB criteria; however, when the intervention was combined with an outreach FH nurse assessment, the result was no significant increase in FH identification using a combination of SB and DLCN criteria. None of the included studies reported adverse effects associated with the interventions. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to determine which is the most effective method of systematically identifying FH in non-specialist settings.

Highlights

  • We identified relevant studies from a comprehensive search of seven electronic databases, grey literature sources and Clinical Trials Registries

  • The search identified a total of 4638 citations, of which 32 citations were identified as potentially eligible based on title and abstract screening, representing 29 studies

  • In the Weng study, it was found that systematically identifying participants in electronic health record (EHR) using on-screen prompts and postal invitations to complete family history questionnaires may slightly increase the number of patients diagnosed with definite Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

All three studies systematically identified FH using reminders (on-screen prompts) in electronic health records. There was insufficient evidence that providing comments on laboratory test results increased the identification of FH using the Dutch Lipid Clinic. Using prompts combined with postal invitation demonstrated no significant increase in definite FH identification using Simon-Broome (SB) criteria; the identification of possible FH increased by 25.4% (CI 17.75 to 33.97%). Using on-screen prompts alone demonstrated a small increase of 0.05% (95% CI 0.03 to 0.07%) in identifying definite FH using SB criteria; when the intervention was combined with an outreach FH nurse assessment, the result was no significant increase in FH identification using a combination of SB and DLCN criteria. There is insufficient evidence to determine which is the most effective method of systematically identifying FH in non-specialist settings

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call