Abstract

This work proposes a method to distinguish between various flow patterns in a multiphase gas–liquid system. The complete discrimination between different flow patterns can be achieved by mapping the corresponding frequency and statistical parameters. These parameters are usually obtained from further analysis conducted on the signal data of the utilized sensor. The proposed technique is based on establishing interrelationships between these parameters, namely the mean (m), the standard deviation ( σ ¯ ), power spectral density (PSD), the width of the characteristic frequency peaks (Δƒ), the skewness ( γ 1 ) and the kurtosis ( γ 2 ). Therefore, a relatively simple electrical capacitance sensor with two electrodes was designed and implemented on a two-phase flow apparatus with a circular pipe. The experimental operating conditions comprised of different combinations of air–water superficial velocities at three inclinations (i.e., horizontal, upward 15° and upward 30°). This research discusses in specific the analysis underlying flow patterns identification method and the rationale for selecting the proposed approach. The results showed that some parameters found to be more valuable than others such as m, σ ¯ and Δƒ. Besides, combining two sets of these statistical graphs which are (a) σ ¯ vs. Δƒ with Δƒ vs. m (or Δƒ vs. total power), (b) Δƒ vs. total power with γ 1 vs. σ ¯ (or γ 2 vs. σ ¯ ), and (c) σ ¯ vs. m with Δƒ vs. m (or Δƒ vs. total power), allowed all flow patterns field to be identified clearly at all inclinations. It is therefore concluded that for any gas–liquid multiphase flow system, the reported approach can be used reliably to discriminate between different generated flow patterns.

Highlights

  • IntroductionA wide ranges of interfaces are possible in a system that depends on two types of flow (i.e., multiphase system: gas–liquid flow, gas–solids flow, or liquid–solids flow), due to the exceptionally great quantity of flow formations inside the pipe or the fluidized bed

  • Initial tests for single-phase experiments were conducted to check the response tests for sensor single-phaseas experiments conducted the response of theInitial capacitance to each of water the phases a function were of time

  • A new technique is proposed in this study to distinguish between different flow patterns in a multiphase flow system

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A wide ranges of interfaces are possible in a system that depends on two types of flow (i.e., multiphase system: gas–liquid flow, gas–solids flow, or liquid–solids flow), due to the exceptionally great quantity of flow formations inside the pipe or the fluidized bed. These interfaces and flow formations manifest themselves as the typical flow regimes or patterns [1,2,3]. (b) liquid/gas/solids holdup (including its time-dependent holdup fluctuations), and (c) pressure drop (including its time-dependent pressure fluctuations) These characteristics, especially the holdup and the pressure fluctuation, are largely influenced by the generated hydrodynamic of the system and its corresponding flow patterns/regimes. In the upward flow inclination, all the abovementioned flow patterns are observed including plug except stratified flow pattern [10,12], whereas in the downward flow inclination, due to the gravity effect, only stratified flow is observed [10]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call