Abstract

To systematically investigate the influence of various data consistency layers and regularization networks with respect to variations in the training and test data domain, for sensitivity-encoded accelerated parallel MR image reconstruction. Magnetic resonance (MR) image reconstruction is formulated as a learned unrolled optimization scheme with a down-up network as regularization and varying data consistency layers. The proposed networks are compared to other state-of-the-art approaches on the publicly available fastMRI knee and neuro dataset and tested for stability across different training configurations regarding anatomy and number of training samples. Data consistency layers and expressive regularization networks, such as the proposed down-up networks, form the cornerstone for robust MR image reconstruction. Physics-based reconstruction networks outperform post-processing methods substantially for R=4 in all cases and for R=8 when the training and test data are aligned. At R=8, aligning training and test data is more important than architectural choices. In this work, we study how dataset sizes affect single-anatomy and cross-anatomy training of neural networks for MRI reconstruction. The study provides insights into the robustness, properties, and acceleration limits of state-of-the-art networks, and our proposed down-up networks. These key insights provide essential aspects to successfully translate learning-based MRI reconstruction to clinical practice, where we are confronted with limited datasets and various imaged anatomies.

Highlights

  • Parallel imaging (PI)1-­3 forms the foundation of accelerated data acquisition in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is tremendously time-­consuming

  • For details on the developments of deep learning for MRI reconstruction, we refer the interested reader to survey papers.10-­13 In this work, we only focus on reviewing relevant approaches for 2D MRI reconstruction

  • For an acceleration factor of R = 4, we observe that all post-­processing UNETs perform inferior than the worst performing reconstruction network, independent of the number and type of training samples

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Parallel imaging (PI)1-­3 forms the foundation of accelerated data acquisition in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which is tremendously time-­consuming. PI combined with compressed sensing (CS) techniques have resulted in substantial improvements in acquisition speed and image quality.4-­9 PI-C­ S can achieve state-­of-­the-­art performance, designing effective regularization schemes and tuning of hyper-­parameters are not trivial. Starting in 2016, deep learning algorithms have become extremely popular and effective tools in data-d­riven learning of inverse problems and have enabled progress beyond the limitations of CS. Deep learning for image reconstruction is an enormously fast-­growing field, which makes it challenging to keep an overview over the different approaches. For details on the developments of deep learning for MRI reconstruction, we refer the interested reader to survey papers.10-­13 In this work, we only focus on reviewing relevant approaches for 2D MRI reconstruction.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call