Abstract
To systematically examine evidence surrounding definitions and reporting of data for viscoelastic testing in veterinary medicine. Standardized, systematic evaluation of the literature, categorization of relevant articles according to level of evidence and quality, and development of consensus on conclusions for application of the concepts to clinical practice. Academic and referral veterinary medical centers. Databases searched included Medline, CAB abstracts, and Google Scholar. All 4 standard thromboelastography (TEG) and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) variables should be universally reported, and the reporting of shear elastic modulus in addition to maximum amplitude (MA) is encouraged. There is insufficient evidence to support universal usage of the coagulation index at this time. The K value and clot formation time are the most variable of the 4 parameters, with alpha angle, MA, and maximum clot firmness generally the least variable. Individual studies should report sufficient data on patients and institutional controls to enable definitions of hypo- and hypercoagulability to be evaluated post-hoc, and it is recommended that all studies specifically report how these conditions were defined. In reporting data relating to fibrinolysis, the TEG variables LY30, LY60, CL30, CL60, and the ROTEM variables LI30, LI60, ML, LOT, and LT should be documented. Studies should report sufficient data on patients and controls to enable definitions of hyper- and hypofibrinolysis to be evaluated post-hoc, and we suggest that standard TEG/ROTEM assays may be unable to detect hypofibrinolysis in companion animals. We recommend that every center establish reference intervals, which are specific to either TEG or ROTEM. These reference intervals should be established using veterinary clinical pathology guidelines, standardized protocols, and a minimum of 40 healthy animals. There are currently insufficient data in companion animals to suggest a utility for Vcurve variables beyond that of standard TEG variables.
Highlights
There are currently 2 main systems, the TEG and rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM), utilizing viscoelastic technology to evaluate hemostasis
Worksheet Question: Which TEG/ROTEM clot formation values should be reported in publications? Conclusions: We recommend that all 4 standard TEG/ROTEM variables are universally reported to enable meta-analyses to be conducted in future
Values for hematocrit, fibrinogen concentration and platelet count should be reported in addition to TEG/ROTEM values to enable the potential impact of these factors on the TEG/ROTEM results to be evaluated
Summary
There are currently 2 main systems, the TEG and ROTEM, utilizing viscoelastic technology to evaluate hemostasis. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence to recommend how hypercoagulability should be defined in companion animals based on TEG/ROTEM parameters at this time.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.