Abstract

Background: To adapt the scientific evaluation tool for the confusion evaluation of health rumors and to test this tool to the confusion evaluation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related health rumors on Chinese online platforms during the outbreak period of COVID-19in China. Methods: The design of our study was systematic evaluation of COVID-19-related health rumors. Retrieved from 7 rumor-repellent platforms, rumors about COVID-19 were collected during the publication from December 1, 2019, to February 6, 2020, and their origins were traced. Researchers evaluated rumors using the confusion evaluation tool in 6 dimensions(creators, evidence selection, evidence evaluation, evidence application, backing and publication platform, conflict of interest). Items were scored using a seven-point Likert scale. The scores were converted into percentages, and the median of rumors from different sources was compared with rank-sum test. Results: Our research included 127 rumors. Scores were converted to percentages, median and interquartile range are used to describe the data. The median score: creators 25.00%(interquartile range, IQR, 16.67-37.50%), evidence selection 27.78% (IQR, 13.89-44.44%),evidence evaluation 33.33% (IQR, 25.00-45.83%), evidence application 36.11% (IQR, 22.22-47.22%), backing and publication platform 8.33% (IQR, 4.17-20.83%), conflict of interest75.00% (IQR, 50.00-83.33%). Almost 40% rumors came from WeChat and the rumors with the lowest scores were concentrated on the WeChat platform. The rumors about prevention methods have relatively lower scores. Conclusion: Most rumors included were not highly confusing for evaluators of this project.WeChat is the "worst-hit area" of COVID-19 related health rumors. More than half rumors focus on the description of prevention methods, which reflects the panic, anxiety and blind conformity of the public under public health emergencies.

Highlights

  • The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic occurred in mid-December 2019

  • We have developed a tool for evaluating the confusing nature of rumors and used it to systematic evaluation of COVID-19 related Internet health rumors during the breaking out period of COVID-19 in China

  • Among the 127 COVID-19-related health rumors included in this study, the great majority of the rumors were not highly confusing for evaluators of this project

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic occurred in mid-December 2019. To adapt the scientific evaluation tool for the confusion evaluation of health rumors and to test this tool to the confusion evaluation of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID19)-related health rumors on Chinese online platforms during the outbreak period of COVID-19 in China. Methods: The design of our study was systematic evaluation of COVID-19-related health rumors. Researchers evaluated rumors using the confusion evaluation tool in 6 dimensions (creators, evidence selection, evidence evaluation, evidence application, backing and publication platform, conflict of interest). The median score: creators 25.00% (interquartile range, IQR, 16.67-37.50%), evidence selection 27.78% (IQR, 13.89-44.44%), evidence evaluation 33.33% (IQR, 25.00-45.83%), evidence application 36.11% (IQR, 22.2247.22%), backing and publication platform 8.33% (IQR, 4.17-20.83%), conflict of interest 75.00% (IQR, 50.00-83.33%). More than half rumors focus on the description of prevention methods, which reflects the panic, anxiety and blind conformity of the public under public health emergencies

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call