Systematic establishment of the relationship between skin absorption and toxicity of furanoids via in silico, in vitro, and in vivo assessments

Abstract

Furanoids are a class of contaminants prevalent in both airborne and occupational environments, with potential health implications through inhalation, oral ingestion, and skin penetration. Given their diminutive molecular size, there is a presumption that furanoids can readily permeate the skin. To systematically explore this presumption, we investigated the skin absorption and toxicity of a series of furans (furfuryl alcohol, furfuryl acetate, furfural, methyl 2-furoate, and 5-methylfurfural) using in silico, in vitro, and in vivo models. The in vitro permeation test (IVPT) from neat and aqueous suspension (5 mM) of furans demonstrated a facile absorption through pig and nude mouse skins. The lipophilicity of furans significantly influenced skin deposition, with higher lipophilicity displaying greater deposition. However, an opposing trend emerged in the receptor compartment accumulation. In barrier-defective skin simulating atopic dermatitis (AD) and psoriasis, enhanced deposition occurred with more hydrophilic furans but not with the more lipophilic ones. In the cell-based study, furanoids induced the proliferation of keratinocytes and skin fibroblasts except for the compounds with the aldehyde group (furfural and 5-methylfurfural). Both furfuryl acetate and 5-methylfurfural activated keratinocytes via the overexpression of COX-2 and PGE2 by 1.5‒2-fold. This stimulation involved the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathway. For the in vivo mouse skin treatment, we selected furfuryl acetate (hydrophilic) and 5-methylfurfural (lipophilic). Both furans showed different patterns of skin lesions, where repeated application of furfuryl acetate caused epidermal hyperplasia and scaling, while 5-methylfurfural predominantly evoked skin inflammation and barrier disintegration. Toxicokinetics analysis revealed a higher plasma concentration of topically applied furfuryl acetate than that of the 5-methylfurfural (5.04 versus 2.34 nmol/ml), resulting in the mild injury of furfuryl acetate-treated peripheral organs. Conversely, no notable adverse effects on organs were observed for the 5-methylfurfural. This study established the relationship between cutaneous absorption and the toxicity of furans following skin exposure.