Abstract

Regulation of gene expression requires the combinatorial binding of sequence-specific transcription factors (TFs) at promoters and enhancers. Prior studies showed that alterations in the spacing between TF binding sites can influence promoter and enhancer activity. However, the relative importance of TF spacing alterations resulting from naturally occurring insertions and deletions (InDels) has not been systematically analyzed. To address this question, we first characterized the genome-wide spacing relationships of 73 TFs in human K562 cells as determined by ChIP-seq (chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing). We found a dominant pattern of a relaxed range of spacing between collaborative factors, including 45 TFs exclusively exhibiting relaxed spacing with their binding partners. Next, we exploited millions of InDels provided by genetically diverse mouse strains and human individuals to investigate the effects of altered spacing on TF binding and local histone acetylation. These analyses suggested that spacing alterations resulting from naturally occurring InDels are generally tolerated in comparison to genetic variants directly affecting TF binding sites. To experimentally validate this prediction, we introduced synthetic spacing alterations between PU.1 and C/EBPβ binding sites at six endogenous genomic loci in a macrophage cell line. Remarkably, collaborative binding of PU.1 and C/EBPβ at these locations tolerated changes in spacing ranging from 5 bp increase to >30 bp decrease. Collectively, these findings have implications for understanding mechanisms underlying enhancer selection and for the interpretation of non-coding genetic variation.

Highlights

  • Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified thousands of genetic variants associated with diseases and other traits (MacArthur et al, 2017; Visscher et al, 2017)

  • Transcription factors primarily co-bind with relaxed spacing 104 We characterized spacing relationships for 73 transcription factors (TFs) of K562 cells covering diverse TF families 105 (Hu et al, 2019) based on the Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-seq data from ENCODE data portal (Davis et al, 2018)

  • Natural genetic variants altering spacing between relaxed transcription factors are associated with less deleteriousness in human populations Based on a global view of the TF spacing relationships, we studied whether these relationships associate with different levels of sensitivity to spacing alterations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified thousands of genetic variants associated with diseases and other traits (MacArthur et al, 2017; Visscher et al, 2017). Flexibility in motif spacing has been demonstrated using reporter assays in Drosophila (Menoret et al, 2013) and HepG2 cells (Smith et al, 2013) These studies did not distinguish the impact of altered spacing on transcription factor binding or subsequent recruitment of co-activators required for gene activation. We leveraged natural genetic variation in numerous human samples and from five strains of mice to study the effect size of spacing alterations on TF binding activity and local histone acetylation These findings suggested that InDels altering spacing are generally less constrained and well tolerated when they occur between TF pairs with relaxed spacing relationships. We experimentally validated substantial tolerance in spacing for macrophage lineage determining TFs (LDTFs), PU. and C/EBP , by introducing a wide range of InDels between their respective binding sites at representative endogenous genomic loci using CRISPR/Cas mutagenesis in mouse macrophages

Results
Discussion
Materials and Methods
Library
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.