Abstract

System safety and reliability assessment relies on historical data and experts opinion for estimating the required failure probabilities. When data comes from different sources, be it different databases or subject domain experts, the estimation of accurate probabilities would be very challenging, if not impossible, and subject to high epistemic uncertainty. In such cases, the use of imprecise probabilities to reflect the incomplete knowledge of analysts and their epistemic uncertainty is inevitable.Evidence theory is an effective tool for manipulating imprecise probabilities. However, challenges in the assignment of prior belief masses and the lack of effective inference algorithms for combining and updating the belief masses have impeded the widespread application of evidence theory.To address the foregoing issues, in the present study, (i) an innovative heuristic approach is developed to determine the prior belief masses based on the prior imprecise probabilities, and (ii) it is demonstrated how Bayesian network can be used for both propagating and updating the belief masses. In a nutshell, the developed methodology converts the prior imprecise probabilities into prior belief masses, propagates and updates the belief masses using Bayesian network, and back-transforms the predicted/updated belief masses to posterior imprecise probabilities.

Highlights

  • Uncertainty is an integral part of system safety and reliability assessment

  • In order to examine the accuracy of the updated belief masses, a comparison between the results of evidential networks (ENs) and a Monte Carlo simulation is performed for both the forward (Fig. 6) and backward (Fig. 9) analyses

  • We developed a methodology for using imprecise probabilities in Bayesian network for system safety assessment under uncertainty

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Uncertainty is an integral part of system safety and reliability assessment. It can be in the form of structural uncertainty, reflecting the indeterminacy in the selection of a model to represent an engineering system, or in the form of parameter uncertainty, reflecting the uncertainty in the data used as model input. The inference algorithms developed based on evidence theory for combining joint/disjoint belief masses are not so effective as those based on probability theory (Simon et al, 2008) This in turn has hindered the application of evidence theory to complicated and interdependent processes and systems. To address the foregoing issues and enhance the efficiency of DST in handing imprecise probabilities, Simon et al (2008, 2009) developed an EN based on Bayesian network (BN), hereafter BN-based EN This way, they managed to use the junction tree algorithm – an algorithm used in BN for belief propagation (Jensen, 1996) – to propagate belief masses, ridding the need of Dempster’s rule of combination.

Evidence theory
Dempster’s rule of combination
Identifying belief masses from imprecise probabilities: A heuristic technique
Ternary event Suppose that we seek the opinion of the experts about the
Quaternary event
Bayesian network
Evidential network
Propagation of belief masses using Bayesian network
Modified BN-based EN
Belief updating in BN-based EN
Truss under tensile stress
Failure assessment
Probability updating
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call