Abstract

This work investigates the system performance characteristics of centralized and decentralized strategies for air traffic separation. A centralized separation strategy and two decentralized separation strategies, implemented as constant-speed heading-change maneuvers, were simulated for randomized horizontal traffic patterns at various traffic densities. Human decision-making of controllers and pilots was not modeled. The centralized strategy represents a controller-oriented separation system generating co-ordinated resolution advisories that emphasize system-level stability. The decentralized strategies represent user-oriented separation systems generating independent resolution advisories that emphasize aircraft-level efficiency. Results from numerical experiments indicate that system stability and efficiency both degrade as traffic density increases, for all separation strategies. Although decentralized separation strategies can give rise to a significant domino effect, the corresponding system efficiency is comparable to that of a benchmark centralized strategy (designed to suppress the domino effect) at traffic densities below a threshold value that is significantly higher than current peak en route densities. Introducing even a limited stability emphasis (look-ahead capability) into the decentralized strategy can significantly reduce the domino effect and the resulting efficiency drop at very high traffic densities.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call