Abstract

Low-power energy harvesting has been demonstrated as a feasible alternative for the power supply of next-generation smart sensors and IoT end devices. In many cases, the output of kinetic energy harvesters is an alternating current (AC) requiring rectification in order to supply the electronic load. The rectifier design and selection can have a considerable influence on the energy harvesting system performance in terms of extracted output power and conversion losses. This paper presents a quantitative comparison of three passive rectifiers in a low-power, low-voltage electromagnetic energy harvesting sub-system, namely the full-wave bridge rectifier (FWR), the voltage doubler (VD), and the negative voltage converter rectifier (NVC). Based on a variable reluctance energy harvesting system, we investigate each of the rectifiers with respect to their performance and their effect on the overall energy extraction. We conduct experiments under the conditions of a low-speed rotational energy harvesting application with rotational speeds of 5 rpm to 20 rpm, and verify the experiments in an end-to-end energy harvesting evaluation. Two performance metrics—power conversion efficiency (PCE) and power extraction efficiency (PEE)—are obtained from the measurements to evaluate the performance of the system implementation adopting each of the rectifiers. The results show that the FWR with PEEs of 20% at 5 rpm to 40% at 20 rpm has a low performance in comparison to the VD (40–60%) and NVC (20–70%) rectifiers. The VD-based interface circuit demonstrates the best performance under low rotational speeds, whereas the NVC outperforms the VD at higher speeds (>18 rpm). Finally, the end-to-end system evaluation is conducted with a self-powered rpm sensing system, which demonstrates an improved performance with the VD rectifier implementation reaching the system’s maximum sampling rate (40 Hz) at a rotational speed of approximately 15.5 rpm.

Highlights

  • Energy harvesting has drawn much interest due to its capability of extending battery lifetime, or even enabling fully energy-autonomous operation of new generations of smart sensors and internet of things edge devices [1,2,3]

  • Three interface circuits based on passive rectifiers, namely full-wave bridge rectifier (FWR), voltage doubler (VD), and negative voltage converter rectifier (NVC), have been compared with respect to their influences on the performance of a lowspeed rotational kinetic energy harvesting system

  • Based on a tuning capacitor, it was shown that a trade-off exists between the optimization of power conversion efficiency (PCE) and power extraction efficiency (PEE)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Energy harvesting has drawn much interest due to its capability of extending battery lifetime, or even enabling fully energy-autonomous operation of new generations of smart sensors and internet of things edge devices [1,2,3]. It can be employed in a number of different application domains, ranging from biomedical engineering, via industrial applications, to structural health monitoring [4,5,6]. The intended system loads are commonly low-power electronic systems, such as Internet of Things (IoT)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call