Abstract

Different synthetic strategies are required for the two kinds of libraries being developed for combinatoral chemistry. Preparation of a ‘focused’ library involves conversion of a known synthetic route to the solid-phase or automated format, whereas generation of a ‘prospecting’ library is driven more by availability of input materials and considerations of structural novelty. While both types can be identified over the history of combinatorial chemistry, elaborating syntheses of novel, nonoligomeric, ‘drug-like’ molecules for use in prospecting libraries is a relatively recent development.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.