Abstract

Humans are highly proficient in learning about the environments in which they operate. They form flexible spatial representations of their surroundings that can be leveraged with ease during spatial foraging and navigation. To capture these abilities, we present a deep Active Inference model of goal-directed behavior, and the accompanying belief updating. Active Inference rests upon optimizing Bayesian beliefs to maximize model evidence or marginal likelihood. Bayesian beliefs are probability distributions over the causes of observable outcomes. These causes include an agent’s actions, which enables one to treat planning as inference. We use simulations of a geocaching task to elucidate the belief updating—that underwrites spatial foraging—and the associated behavioral and neurophysiological responses. In a geocaching task, the aim is to find hidden objects in the environment using spatial coordinates. Here, synthetic agents learn about the environment via inference and learning (e.g., learning about the likelihoods of outcomes given latent states) to reach a target location, and then forage locally to discover the hidden object that offers clues for the next location.

Highlights

  • Foraging is a type of goal-directed search process whereby agents explore a given space with the purpose of discovering resources of limited availability

  • We focus on the specific role of uncertainty in spatial foraging to elucidate, both theoretically and neurophysiologically, how goal-directed epistemic behavior depends on the level of uncertainty about internal representations of the state of the world—and the planned exchange with that world

  • We review the numerical experiments in light of current empirical findings in the spatial foraging literature

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Foraging is a type of goal-directed search process whereby (biological or synthetic) agents explore a given space with the purpose of discovering resources of (sometimes) limited availability This search process is encountered in literature under various frameworks such as navigation (Montague et al, 1995; Rutledge et al, 2009; Humphries and Prescott, 2010; Pearson et al, 2014; Constantino and Daw, 2015; Kaplan and Friston, 2018), attention and visual salience (Itti and Koch, 2000; Parkhurst et al, 2002), or semantic memory (Hills et al, 2012; Todd and Hills, 2020). Each of these frameworks considers different components of complex multi-network and multi-function behavior.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.