Abstract

Synthetic MR imaging enables the creation of various contrast-weighted images including double inversion recovery and phase-sensitive inversion recovery from a single MR imaging quantification scan. Here, we assessed whether synthetic MR imaging is suitable for detecting MS plaques. Quantitative and conventional MR imaging data on 12 patients with MS were retrospectively analyzed. Synthetic T2-weighted, FLAIR, double inversion recovery, and phase-sensitive inversion recovery images were produced after quantification of T1 and T2 values and proton density. Double inversion recovery images were optimized for each patient by adjusting the TI. The number of visible plaques was determined by a radiologist for a set of these 4 types of synthetic MR images and a set of conventional T1-weighted inversion recovery, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. Conventional 3D double inversion recovery and other available images were used as the criterion standard. The total acquisition time of synthetic MR imaging was 7 minutes 12 seconds and that of conventional MR imaging was 6 minutes 29 seconds The lesion-to-WM contrast and lesion-to-WM contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated and compared between synthetic and conventional double inversion recovery images. The total plaques detected by synthetic and conventional MR images were 157 and 139, respectively (P = .014). The lesion-to-WM contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio on synthetic double inversion recovery images were superior to those on conventional double inversion recovery images (P = .001 and < 0.001, respectively). Synthetic MR imaging enabled detection of more MS plaques than conventional MR imaging in a comparable acquisition time. The contrast for MS plaques on synthetic double inversion recovery images was better than on conventional double inversion recovery images.

Highlights

  • MATERIALS AND METHODSQuantitative and conventional MR imaging data on 12 patients with MS were retrospectively analyzed

  • BACKGROUND AND PURPOSESynthetic MR imaging enables the creation of various contrast-weighted images including double inversion recovery and phase-sensitive inversion recovery from a single MR imaging quantification scan

  • Monitoring new or enlarging MS plaques is suitable for following disease activity when evaluating treat

Read more

Summary

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Participants The study was approved by the institutional review board of Juntendo University Hospital, Tokyo, Japan. The median SD of the SIs of the following 12 ROIs, all of which were 2.4 ϫ 2.4 mm[2], was defined as the noise for each patient: ROIs in the CSF (bilaterally in the anterior horns of the lateral ventricles), in the GM (bilaterally in the thalamus, occipital cortex, and frontal cortex), and in the WM (in the corpus callosum— one in the genu and another in the splenium—and bilaterally in the centrum semiovale) This approach was a modified version of the method used by Blystad et al.[13]. A 2-sided P value Ͻ .05 was considered significant

RESULTS
CONCLUSIONS
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call