Synthetic MRI in the detection and quantitative evaluation of sacroiliac joint lesions in axial spondyloarthritis.

Abstract

ObjectiveOur primary objective was to verify the hypothesis that synthetic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is similar to conventional MRI in detecting sacroiliac joint lesions in patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA). A secondary objective was to assess the quantitative value of synthetic mapping in bone marrow edema (BME) and fat metaplasia.MethodsA total of 132 axSpA patients who underwent synthetic and conventional MRI from October 2019 to March 2021 were included in this prospective study. Two independent readers visually evaluated active inflammatory (BME, capsulitis, enthesitis, and inflammation at site of erosion) and structural lesions (erosion, sclerosis, ankylosis, and fat metaplasia) of the sacroiliac joints on conventional and synthetic magnetic resonance (MR) images. In addition, T1, T2, and proton density (PD) values, which were generated by synthetic mapping, were used to further quantitatively evaluate BME and fat metaplasia. A McNemar test was used to compare the differences between the two methods in the detection of sacroiliac joint lesions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess the inter-reader consistency of quantitative values. Mann–Whitney tests were performed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were created for all quantitative analyses.ResultsThere were no statistical difference between synthetic and conventional MRI in the detection of sacroiliac joint lesions (all p-values > 0.05). A total of 103 images of BME and 111 images of fat metaplasia were quantitatively evaluated using T1, T2, and PD values. The consistency of quantitative values among readers was good (ICC 0.903–0.970). T1 and T2 values were consistently higher in BME than in normal marrow (p < 0.001), but PD values were not significantly different (p = 0.830). T2 and PD values were higher in fat metaplasia than in normal marrow, but T1 values were lower (p < 0.001). In the case of BME, T1 values had greater diagnostic efficiency [area under the curve (AUC) 0.99] than T2 values (AUC 0.78). There were no significant differences in the diagnostic efficiency of T1 (AUC 0.88), T2 (AUC 0.88), and PD (AUC 0.88) values in the case of fat metaplasia.ConclusionSynthetic MRI is as effective as conventional MRI in detecting sacroiliac joint lesions in patients with axSpA. Furthermore, synthetic mapping can accurately quantify BME and fat metaplasia.