Abstract

Synthetic MR provides qualitative and quantitative multi-parametric data about tissue properties in a single acquisition. Its use in stroke imaging is not yet established. We compared synthetic and conventional image quality and studied synthetic relaxometry of acute and chronic ischemic lesions to investigate its interest for stroke imaging. We prospectively acquired synthetic and conventional brain MR of 43 consecutive adult patients with suspected stroke. We studied a total of 136 lesions, of which 46 DWI-positive with restricted ADC (DWI + /rADC), 90 white matter T2/FLAIR hyperintensities (WMH) showing no diffusion restriction, and 430 normal brain regions (NBR). We assessed image quality for lesion definition according to a 3-level score by two readers of different experiences. We compared relaxometry of lesions and regions of interest. Synthetic images were superior to their paired conventional images for lesion definition except for sFLAIR (sT1 or sPSIR vs. cT1 and sT2 vs. cT2 for DWI + /rADC and WMH definition; p values < .001) with substantial to almost perfect inter-rater reliability (κ ranging from 0.711 to 0.932, p values < .001). We found significant differences in relaxometry between lesions and NBR and between acute and chronic lesions (T1, T2, and PD of DWI + /rADC or WMH vs. mirror NBR; p values < .001; T1 and PD of DWI + /rADC vs. WMH; p values of 0.034 and 0.008). Synthetic MR may contribute to stroke imaging by fast generating accessible weighted images for visual inspection derived from rapidly acquired relaxometry data. Moreover, this synthetic relaxometry could differentiate acute and chronic ischemic lesions.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call