Abstract

Background: Different augmentation techniques have been described in the literature in addition to the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the use of cements, bone substitutes, and other devices for the augmentation of proximal humeral fractures. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by using PubMed/MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Cochrane Library, Scopus/EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases according the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines over the years 1966 to 2019. The search term “humeral fracture proximal” was combined with “augmentation”; “polymethylmethacrylate, PMMA”; “cement”; “bone substitutes”; “hydroxyapatite”; “calcium phosphates”; “calcium sulfate”; “cell therapies”, and “tissue engineering” to find the literature relevant to the topic under review. Results: A total of 10 clinical studies considered eligible for the review, with a total of 308 patients, were included. Mean age at the time of injury was 68.8 years (range of 58–92). The most commonly described techniques were reinforcing the screw–bone interface with bone PMMA cement (three studies), filling the metaphyseal void with synthetic bone substitutes (five studies), and enhancing structural support with metallic devices (two studies). Conclusion: PMMA cementation could improve screw-tip fixation. Calcium phosphate and calcium sulfate injectable composites provided good biocompatibility, osteoconductivity, and lower mechanical failure rate when compared to non-augmented fractures. Mechanical devices currently have a limited role. However, the available evidence is provided mainly by level III to IV studies, and none of the proposed techniques have been sufficiently studied.

Highlights

  • The incidence of proximal humeral fractures (PHF) is increasing with the growth of the elderly population [1]

  • We studied patients with osteoporotic humeral fractures who had received surgical reduction and fixation associated with different augmentation techniques: cementation, bone substitutes, and mechanical devices

  • The available data support the effectiveness of Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), calcium phosphate, and calcium sulfate cement augmentation, which seems to be reproducible and safe when associated with conventional fixation techniques

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The incidence of proximal humeral fractures (PHF) is increasing with the growth of the elderly population [1]. No consensus exists with regard to the optimal fixation strategy for the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures. Locking plate fixation with multiaxial screws is considered the most suitable procedure, for multi-fragmentary fractures, but according the literature, it comes with a complication rate up to 49% [6,7,8,9,10,11]. Different augmentation techniques have been described in the literature in addition to the surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze the use of cements, bone substitutes, and other devices for the augmentation of proximal humeral fractures. The available evidence is provided mainly by level III to IV studies, and none of the proposed techniques have been sufficiently studied

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call