Abstract

Kinetoplastid protozoa possess properties that are highly divergent from the mammalian, yeast and bacterial cells more commonly used in synthetic biology and represent a tantalisingly untapped source of bioengineering potential. Trypanosoma brucei brucei (T. b. brucei), an established model organism for studying the Kinetoplastida, is non-pathogenic to humans and provides an interesting test case for establishing synthetic biology in this phylogenetic class. To demonstrate further the tractability of Kinetoplastida to synthetic biology, we sought to construct and demonstrate a Goodwin oscillator, the simplest oscillatory gene network, in T. b. brucei for the first time. We report one completed iteration of the archetypal synthetic biology Design–Build–Test–Learn (DBTL) cycle; firstly, using Ab initio mathematical modelling of the behaviour a theoretical, oscillatory, trypanosomal synthetic gene network (SGN) to inform the design of a plasmid encoding that network. Once assembled, the plasmid was then used to generate a stable transfectant T. b. brucei cell line. To test the performance of the oscillatory SGN, a novel experimental setup was established to capture images of the fluorescent signal from motion-restricted live cells. Data captured were consistent with oscillatory behaviour of the SGN, with cellular fluorescence observed to oscillate with a period of 50 min, with varying amplitude and linear growth trend. This first DBTL cycle establishes a foundation for future cycles in which the SGN design and experimental monitoring setup can be further refined.

Highlights

  • Goodwin (1963) proposed the simplest genetic oscillator (Figure 1) as a single gene that auto-represses its own expression

  • The tetracycline repressor (TetR) protein open reading frames (ORFs) would be under transcriptional control of a strong, constitutive trypanosomal promoter designed to features a tetracycline operator (tetO) DNA sequence

  • We have designed and simulated how an synthetic gene network (SGN) encoding a GFP-based Gibson oscillator could function in T. b. brucei cells and informed by those simulations, successfully built and tested genes and transgenic cells to observe oscillations in their fluorescence with a period of 50 min, varying amplitude and linear growth trend

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Goodwin (1963) proposed the simplest genetic oscillator (Figure 1) as a single gene that auto-represses its own expression. A diverse range of oscillatory dynamics have been observed, with oscillatory period cycles spanning 13 min (Stricker et al, 2008) to 26 h (Tigges et al, 2010), non-sinusoidal relaxation oscillations with steep amplitude rises and gradual decreases (Tigges et al, 2010; Atkinson et al, 2003), as well as classical sinusoidal oscillation patterns (Danino et al, 2010; Stricker et al, 2008) Biological noise, such as the non-synchronicity and range of transcription and translation rates between genetically identical cells (Tsimring 2014), has been suggested as the cause of stochasticity, amplitude variability (Elowitz and Leibler 2000) and amplitude dampening (Fung et al, 2005; Atkinson et al, 2003)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call