Abstract

The aim of this paper is to compare research criteria for inclusive education in relation to criteria for didactic research. The inclusive researchers that were selected defined inclusive education as removing barriers to social participation and learning for all students. The didactic researchers that we have selected referred to the tradition of successful reading and writing, focused on schools and teaching practices with favourable outcomes. The results indicated that the inclusive education researchers study school mainly from an organisational point of view. In contrast, the didactic researchers focus on a pedagogical approach, that is, on the teachers’ teaching strategies concerning the ways in which each student learns best. Within both fields under study it is considered that in-service training is most effective when it is based on the teachers’ actual working situation and when it emphasizes the importance of cooperative school cultures where the teachers also meet researchers. A reflection is that the inclusive education researchers in the study strive to transfer new knowledge to the teachers, in order to help them broaden their views on reducing social and organisational barriers to inclusion. The reading and writing researchers presented in this study represent a more dialectical process aimed at developing both the teachers’ didactic professionalism, the researchers’ own research questions and, in the end, the students’ learning. Another reflection is that if inclusive education and didactic researchers were to develop collaborative research cultures, this would shorten the way to the common goal: to ensure the participation and learning of all students.

Highlights

  • In the debate on teachers’ abilities to deal with increasing variation and diversity among school pupils, interest in both inclusive education research and didactic research has increased

  • Many stud­ ents ex­per­ i­ence difficulties in learning and an exclusionary situation at school. (Skolv­ erket, 2017; Rose & Shevlin, 2017; Fredriksson, 2012; Heimdahl Mattson & Roll-Pettersson, 2007). Both inclusive education and reading and writing research have produced knowl­edge of importance for schools, but they have developed in different fields

  • Inclusive education res­ earch has focused on societal issues such as values, policy, power and organisation (Skrtic, Sailor & Gee, 1996), and is seldom based on teachers’ practical instruction (Florian, 2014)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the debate on teachers’ abilities to deal with increasing variation and diversity among school pupils, interest in both inclusive education research and didactic research has increased. If students are to be able to absorb all the subjects, genres and vari­­ous aims of reading, writing and expressing themselves in speech that they will meet in the future, they will need to develop strategies for this (Berge et al, 2019; Cummins, 2017; Gibbons, 2015; Pressley & Allington, 2015; Tjernberg, 2013; Moats, 2009; Snow & Juel, 2007; Crawford & Torgesen, 2006;) They will al­so need to learn how to sort out and critically examine information in order to be able to argue and present their viewpoints so as to influence their own life situations and pow­er relations in society in general. According to Cummins (2003) this means seeing ed­u­ca­tion not merely as a learning process and as a socio-political issue

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call