Abstract
AbstractThe reduction of the 18‐VE complexes (η5C5H5)Ni[η5‐(CR1)2(BR2)2CR3] (2a, b) with potassium in THF leads to the paramagnetic anions 2–, which react with NiBr2 · DME to give the triple‐decker complexes (η5‐C5H5)Ni[μ,η5‐(CR1)2(BR2)2CR3]Ni(η5‐C5H5) (3a, b) and the tetradecker {(η5‐C5H5)Ni[μ,η5‐(CR1)2(BR2)2CR3]}2Ni (4b). Surprisingly, 4b is also obtained by heating the double‐decker complex 2b and H2AlOCMe3 in THF. The reaction between 2c and AlH3 in Et2O leads to the substitution of the ethoxy groups at the boron atoms and to the formation of the tetradecker 4d with four B–H groups. Heating of the 1,3‐benzodiborole ligand 1e and [(C5H5)Ni(CO)]2 in toluene yields small amounts of 2e and 3e, and the tetradecker 4e. X‐ray structure analyses were performed for 4d and 4e. Complex 4d is centrosymmetric with relatively short nickel‐to‐bridging ligand distances (1.69, 1.70 Å). In the tetradecker 4e the two bridging ligands adopt a synclinal conformation (rotating about 36° resp. 41° against each other). The Ni–Ni distance (3.42, 3.43) is slightly longer than in 4d (3.39 Å). The electronic structures of the tripledecker cation 3+ (32 VE) and of the tetradecker 4 (46 VE) have been investigated by means of the Fenske‐Hall method. The findings are in agreement with the experimental results that 3+ is a triplet species and 4 possesses a closed‐shell electron configuration.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have