Synthesis, spectral and electrochemical properties of mixed-ligand ruthenium(II) complexes of bis(pyrid-2-yl)- and bis(benzimidazol-2-yl)-dithioether ligands: Effect of an asymmetric diimine co-ligand

Abstract

Two new mixed-ligand Ru(II) complexes [Ru(pdto)(dppt)](ClO 4) 2 ( 1) and [Ru(bbdo)(dppt)](ClO 4) 2 ( 2), where pdto = 1,8-bis(pyrid-2-yl)-3,6-dithiaoctane, bbdo = 1,8-bis(benzimidazol-2-yl)-3,6-dithiaoctane and dppt = 3-(pyridin-2-yl)-5,6-diphenyl-1,2,4-triazine, have been isolated and characterised by elemental analysis. NMR and electronic absorption and emission spectral and electrochemical techniques have been used to investigate the solution structures and electronic properties of the complexes. The 1H and 13C spectra of the complexes in solution reveal that the N 2S 2 donor set of the pdto and bbdo ligands is “ cis-α” coordinated and the dppt ligand is chelated to Ru(II) through both triazine N2 and pyridine nitrogen atoms. The proton chemical shifts of the phenyl rings of dppt are not affected much upon coordination, supporting the triazine N2 rather than N4 coordination. The anomalous upfield shifts of the H 61 and H 62 ( 1) and H 72 and H 81 ( 2) protons are caused by the shielding magnetic anisotropy due to the ring currents of the py and tra rings of dppt, which are forced to be coplanar by coordination. The py and bzim rings of pdto and bbdo are obliged to rotate away from dppt and the Ru–N py and Ru–N bzim bonds lengthen in order to minimise the steric clashes with dppt. The c.i.s values for 1 are less positive than those for 2 suggesting that the ligand bzim nitrogens of bbdo rather than the py nitrogens of pdto are involved in stronger σ-bonding with Ru(II). Both the complexes display a strong MLCT transition ( 1, 470; 2, 515 nm) along with intense intraligand transitions in the UV region, and when excited in the MLCT band an emission band (650 nm) is observed for both 1 and 2. In acetonitrile solution they show a quasi-reversible Ru(II)/Ru(III) redox couple ( E 1/2, 1, 1.18; 2, 0.90 V). Two more redox processes ( E 1/2, 1, −0.97, −1.09; 2, −1.06, −1.42 V) involving the coordinated dppt ligand are also observed. A plot of the difference between the metal oxidation and ligand reduction potentials of the complexes versus the absorption or emission maxima is linear, illustrating that the lowest π ∗ orbitals of dppt are involved in the redox, absorption and emission processes in the complexes. Electrochemical parameterisation of the Ru(II)/Ru(III) redox potentials of the present complexes has been carried out using Lever’s method and the calculated ligand reduction potential E L(L) correlates well with the observed Ru(II)/Ru(III) redox potentials.