Abstract

Efficient new extractant design relies on systematic structure–property studies. However, systematic structure–property research on extractants of organic phosphinic acids is far from sufficient. To make up for this deficiency, twelve organic phosphinic acid extractants (including nine dialkylphosphinic acids, two dicycloalkylphosphinic acids and one diarylphosphinic acid) were synthesized with free-radical-addition-reaction method and Grignard-reaction method. Reaction rules, advantages and disadvantages of these two methods were discussed respectively. The extraction ability and separation performance of the synthesized organic phosphinic acids for Tm, Yb and Lu from HNO3 solutions were evaluated and compared. For dialkylphosphinic acids the nearer the branched chain moved to P atom, the more reduction generated on the extraction ability. Dialkylphosphinic acids without branched chain in α-C or β-C (e.g. HYY-3, HYY-5, HYY-7 and HYY-9) exhibited strong extraction ability as P507. On the contrary, dialkylphosphinic acids with branched chain in α-C (e.g. HYY-4, HYY-8) and dicyclohexylphosphinic acids exhibited poor extraction ability as Cyanex 272. New compound Di-(2,3-dimethylbutyl)-phosphinic acid (HYY-2) exhibited good extraction ability and separation performance and its separation factors of Lu/Yb, Yb/Tm and Lu/Tm were 1.42, 3.10 and 4.40 respectively, apparently superior to Cyanex 272 (βLu/Yb=1.31, βYb/Tm=3.25, βLu/Tm=4.26).

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.