Abstract

Several new mononuclear and dinuclear ruthenium(II) complexes – incorporating 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine and acetylacetonate as ancillary ligands and phenylcyanamide derivative ligands – of the type [Ru(tpy)(acac)(L)] and [{Ru(tpy)(acac)} 2(μ-L′)] (where tpy = 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine, acac = acetylacetonate, L = hmbpcyd = 4-(3-hydroxy-3-methylbutynyl)phenylcyanamide anion ( 2) and epcyd = 4-ethynylphenylcyanamide anion ( 3) and L′ = bcpda = bis(4-cyanamidophenyl)diacetylene dianion ( 4) and bcpea = 9,10-bis(4-cyanamidophenylethynyl)anthracene dianion ( 5)) were synthesized in a stepwise manner starting from [Ru(tpy)(acac)(Ipcyd)] ( 1), where Ipcyd = 4-iodophenylcyanamide anion. Tetraphenylarsonium salts of the phenylcyanamide derivative ligands were also prepared. The four complexes have been characterized by UV–Vis, IR, ES-MS, electrochemistry and 1H NMR. Mononuclear complexes 2 and 3 were further characterized by 13C NMR. The single crystal X-ray structure of 2 was determined, it crystallized with one molecule of water with empirical formula of C 32H 31N 5O 5Ru, in a monoclinic crystal system and space group of P2 1 /n with a = 17.642(5) Å, b = 9.634(2) Å, c = 20.063(7) Å, β = 92.65(3)°, V = 3406(2) Å 3 and Z = 4. The structure was refined to a final R factor of 0.040. The Ru(III/II) couple of 1– 3 appeared around 0.34 V versus the saturated calomel electrode in dimethylformamide and at a slightly higher potential, around 0.36–0.37 V for 4 and 5. Spectroelectrochemical studies were also performed for 4 and 5, no intervalence transition was observed despite all attempts.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call