Abstract

Cerium oxide nanoparticles have been used in a number of non-medical products over the years. The therapeutic application of these nanoparticles has mainly been due to their oxidative stress ameliorating abilities. Their enzyme-mimetic catalytic ability to change between the Ce3+ and Ce4+ species makes them ideal for a role as free-radical scavengers for systemic diseases as well as neurodegenerative diseases. In this review, we look at various methods of synthesis (including the use of stabilizing/capping agents and precursors), and how the synthesis method affects the physicochemical properties, their behavior in biological environments, their catalytic abilities as well as their reported toxicity.

Highlights

  • During the latter years of the 1960s, scientists dedicated to miniaturized delivery systems introduced nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems and vaccines [1]

  • There are studies that show that the resultant properties such as pro/antioxidant and toxicity of cerium oxide are mainly dependent on synthesis conditions such as pH, temperature, and method of synthesis which confer behavior-altering physicochemical properties such as size/agglomeration, morphology, surface chemistry, and zeta potential [22,23,24,25]

  • The results suggested that the application of surfactants in the synthesis process yielded cerium oxide nanoparticles with high surface area compared to the surfactant-free synthesis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During the latter years of the 1960s, scientists dedicated to miniaturized delivery systems introduced nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems and vaccines [1]. The nanoscale form, cerium oxide nanoparticles retain the fluorite structure with oxygen deficiencies. The (111) and the (100) possess the o-terminal endings, while the (110) arrangement exposes the Ce center and the O ions [5,6] These properties enable these nanoparticles to be very useful in industrial applications such as the removal of carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, and nitric oxide species from the exhaust gas. SThoef tchateaslaesen-manimoipckainrtgicalcetsivietimespwloeyreedmetahseurpedulbsyedthee leadcdtritoionneovfaporation hydrogen peroxide to the cerium oxide nanoparticle (CNP) suspension and was measured at the 380 as the metnhmodabsoofrpstyionnt.hVeasziisr.ovTahnde ccoawtaolrakseers-msuigmgeisctkedintghaat csutirvfaicteiedsowpinegreofmmeeatsalusroendtobtyhethCeNPasddition of hydrogen ipncerreoasxeisdtehetoCet3h+/eCec4+eraiutiomanodxitdhee nnuamnboepr aorftivcalcean(cCieNs oPn) tshuesnpaennospiaortniclaensdurfwacaes[1m6].eaTshuisred at the 380 nm abcsoonrspeqtuioennt.lyVinaczrieraosevs athnedpociontws oofriknteerrsacstiuongganedstreeadcttihonatonsuthrefsaucrefadceospoifnthge onafnmopeatratilcsleos.nTthoe the CNPs increases tchatealaCsee-3l+ik/eCaect4i+vitrieastiaoreadnepdentdheentnounmthbe eCre4+offravctaiocna.nAcisetusdoynasstehsesednathneocpataalratsiec-lleikesuacrtfivaictiees[16].

Synthesis of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles and Their Properties
Size of Nanoparticles
Aggregation and Agglomeration of the Particle System
Particle Morphology
Chemical Composition
Surface Chemistry and Physical Properties
Precipitation Method
Microemulsification Method
Hydrothermal Method
Green Synthesis Routes
2.10. Solvothermal Method
2.11. Sol-Gel Method
2.12. Ball Milling
2.13. Flame Spray Pyrolysis
2.14. Reverse-Phase Evaporation
2.15. Reverse Micelle
Toxicity and Cytotoxicity of Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles
Findings
Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call