Abstract

A series of mononuclear (C1–C4) and dendritic G1 (DC1–DC4) and G2 (DC5–DC8) cationic CuI iminopyridine complexes of the general formula [Cu{(R‐C5H3N)CH=N(nPr)‐κ2‐N,N}2][BF4] (C1: R = 6‐Me; C2: R = H; C3: R = 6‐Br; C4: R = C4H3) and [DAB‐Gx‐PPI‐(Cu{(R‐C5H3N)‐κ2‐N,N}y)z][BF4]n [DAB: 1,4‐diaminobutane; PPI: poly(propyleneimine); for G1: x = 1, y = 4, z = 2, n = 2; for G2: x = 2, y = 8, z = 4, n = 4; DC1/DC5: R = 6‐Me; DC2/DC6: R = H; DC3/DC7: R = 6‐Br; DC4/DC8: R = C4H3] have been prepared and characterized by a range of spectroscopic and analytical techniques. The mononuclear and dendritic complexes were found to be active catalysts for the hydroxylation of 4‐iodotoluene to p‐cresol in DMSO/H2O mixtures. A positive dendritic effect on catalytic activity was observed. Furthermore, our catalyst system was found to be active for the hydroxylation of 4‐iodotoluene in neat water. The active catalyst could be recycled twice before catalyst deactivation was observed. HRTEM analysis revealed that catalyst deactivation arose as a result of metal agglomeration. A series of poisoning experiments provided evidence for the mediation of hydroxylation by a homogeneous active species for both classes of pre‐catalysts, and a radical‐trapping experiment in combination with our experimental observations provided evidence that the reaction proceeds through a similar mechanism to that reported for Cu‐catalyzed halide exchange.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.